Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Un-Settling Turtle Island: will you, or won't you? Who's with me?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AlienGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 02:21 AM
Original message
Un-Settling Turtle Island: will you, or won't you? Who's with me?
Considering how much outrage has been amassed over the displacement of the Palestinians, I think the time is right for the Un-Settle Turtle Island movement to take hold.

This Un-Settlement will return to its original owners the land that was stolen and swindled away from First Nations peoples by the Europeans. That this crime began hundreds of years does not make it any less of a crime, nor does it make the nation that now occupies that land any less guilty of (at the very least) receiving stolen property.

My proposal is this: If I own any land, I will make a provision of my will that upon my death, its ownership will revert to the Nation that originally lived there. They can use it or sell it at current market value if they see fit--either way, they will get their property back.

If enough occupiers of North America do this, eventually the First Nations will regain much of their original land! I am sure they will let the rest of us keep living here.

Tucker

PS. If you won't join this movement, why won't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm...
Edited on Thu Jul-20-06 02:26 AM by benburch
You could argue my land is already in the hands of a member of the Choctaw...

But really it ought to belong to the Potawatami Tribe.

I'll consider your idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Does this apply to Caledonia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. and Diego Garcia?? and Hawaii??
The egg, once scrambled cannot go into the shell and produce a chick.

BUT

enlightened people can apologize, reimburse, and possibly get all involved parties to sit together and hash out trheir own destinies.. That's what's been denied them for AGES.. Usually uneducated indigenous people who got hornswaggled by crafty wersterners..:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. "uneducated"
Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. "Uneducated" ...as in the ability to read and understand the english
in the paperwork that undid their country... (uneducated in the WESTERN ways).. Not unintelligent...indigenous people managed for eons before contact with westerners..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, and a question...
...what if the tribe that the particular land used to belong to was wiped out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlienGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I suppose in that case it should revert to the tribe that's closest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. OK, that makes sense.
And what of lands that were in eternal dispute? There were some places that were boundary lands that nobody really owned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlienGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. They can go back to being disputed by the same disputors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. nice thought
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlienGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why, thank you!
It is more than a thought; it has been my plan for many years now, and this is the perfect opportunity to advocate for it.

Tucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I LIKE the idea,
AG. There are Sauk and Fox descendants here. My neighbor showed me the original deed to their property, originally the whole of this small valley, proudly exclaiming how their ancestors stole the land from the Native Americans of the area. I shall pass this idea along.

Jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I've considered this
It would be more than fitting to return my place to the first people. Neat to see the idea here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. i like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. FYI: Odyssey of the 8th Fire
Under the sky sign of the Whirling Rainbow

http://www.8thfire.net/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. One has to be careful with the wording.
One must encumber the title deed such that the land will always be part of the tribal lands and may never be sold for any reason whatsoever.

I think a lawyer will have to weigh in here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlienGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I would not put that restriction on it
If it's not my land, where do I get off telling the rightful owners that they may not sell it?

Tucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. I have to admit this is an intriguing idea
Especially since my partner and I have no heirs. But her people come from Oaxaca, Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkmoonIkonoklast Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. I have an additional notion, more as an "in the mean time" plan...
   It's actually in the form of paired petitions to be taken before the United Nations.
   One would extend Formal United Nations recognition as Sovereign Nations to all existing AmerInd Tribes, either individually, or in whatever aggregate THE TRIBES choose to form, regardless of whether they are Federally Recognized. The other would request immediate consideration for membership of those tribes, or tribal confederations, in the United Nations.
   This has been standing, Official Policy of my "group", the United Solidarity Alliance since its inception back in the early 1980s. (I say "group, as currently, it has a membership of one. I have, however, long considered AG, along with several others NOT currently members of D.U. as members of the Alliance Board, to be formally invited to serve, if and when.)
   If someone with actual experience in such matters wishes to promote these petitions, I would be pleased to enroll them in the Alliance, with the Official Title of Associate Director of Policy Planning and Implementation.
   Comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. at first I thought you were being cynical
but upon reading, your idea is actually quite good, no.. wonderful!

:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC