Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why didn't Bush OK the stem cell bill, then issue a signing statement?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:23 PM
Original message
Why didn't Bush OK the stem cell bill, then issue a signing statement?
Does Bush's veto today nullify his use of Signing Statements? Of course not. But it should. It should be Exhibit A in front of the Supreme Court. Bush's veto today proves that Bush doesn't need to use signing statements at all because he is, after all, perfectly capable of simply signing a veto if he doesn't like a bill. Otherwise, Bush could have approved this bill, speechify about it (as he already did), then issue a signing statement saying that he won't allow any funding or some such typical shit.

So? There has to be a legal term for this, right? The one event (the veto) basically calling "bullshit" on the signing statement thing?

Oh, WTF...it is George Bush. The law means nothing to him anyway. He just makes it up as he goes along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. my guess- vetoes get attention, signing statements don't
and they like it that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because it was a dog and pony show for his base.
It's an election year, and the veto was a signal to the fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's all about the SHOW for the Potemkin President...... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Legal term is politicizing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. It is no coincidence that this came to a vote at this time,
during the election cycle. Bush's base is eroding fast, there is trouble with Christian conservatives, and he needed something to prove he is still with them. He may save a few votes for the repubs by doing this. Or, at least he, Cheney and Rove think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because he didn't plan to personally violate * this* law...
just the rest.

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Good point
He only issues signing statements re: laws which impact his ability to war and maim and kill freely. This law will have absolutely no impact on Georgie whatsoever, so he isn't going to risk one of his precious Notice Of Intent To Ignore The Law statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here Are The Reasons
Here are the Reasons the White House Idiot did what he did today:

1. Election Year

2. Pandering

3. He is a complete and total moronic idiot.

4. He doesn't care about poor people who suffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. He promised Satan, and he had to make it public this time
to "honor" his contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. The purpose of the signing statement is to allow him personally
to disobey the law. In this case, the signing statement would have to apply to the scientists. That's too complicated. And as the previous poster said, he wants to make a show of his official disapproval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC