Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Growing Threat of Right-Wing Christians

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 12:18 PM
Original message
The Growing Threat of Right-Wing Christians
Roychoudhuri: Can you give an example?

Goldberg: In the Department of Health and Human Services, the people they hired to formulate sex education policy, at both the national and international level, didn't come from the American Medical Association or the big medical schools. They're coming from places like the Medical Institute for Sexual Health, which is this Christian Nationalist medical group. (The group says it is a "nonprofit scientific, educational organization to confront the global epidemics of non-marital pregnancy.")

One of the earlier stories I did for Salon was on the UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) which does family planning, but they don't do abortion, mostly safe childcare and reproductive health through clinics all over the world. Congress had appropriated $35 million to the UNFPA. There's this group called the Population Research Institute -- another one of these parallel institutions. They're radically anti-family planning and claim that population control policies are part of this "one-world conspiracy" to cull the population of the faithful so that the "one-world government" can more easily assert its control. On the website it said that not only is overpopulation a myth, but all the people on Earth could live comfortably in the state of Texas. I did this story in 2002. I still had this naïve idea that this kind of thing would remain marginal.

But what's amazing is that Population Research Institution went on to testify before Congress saying that the UNFPA promotes forced abortions in China. These kinds of accusations start echoing up the ladder to the point where Bush froze the UNFPA funding. This despite the fact that the State Department had already sent a delegation to China to investigate and said there was nothing to these accusations at all.
...
Bush wanted to get the Salvation Army aboard the faith-based initiatives. The Salvation Army then brought in a consultant to Christianize certain divisions. He asked the human resources director at the Salvation Army headquarters, Maureen Schmidt, whether one of the human resource staffers at the social services division, Margaret Geissman, was Jewish, because she had a "Jewish sounding name." Schmidt told him that she wasn't. So then he went to her and said, "I want a list of homosexuals who work there."

http://www.alternet.org/story/38830/


She goes on to define Christian Nationalists, which she thinks are 10-15% of Americans, and the difficulty of discussing this without saying "fascism", because that sounds extreme, although this is a stage towards it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. good article. thanks for the link. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. .
Will be back for this one when I have the time it deserves. Thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. What's wrong with calling them "Christian fascists"?
It would distinguish them from real Christians -- which is a good thing. It would label them for what they are. And it would explain what the problem is, in a nutshell.

Where's the downside of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I Object to Calling Them Christians At All
"Render unto Caesar" and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I prefer "Christo-fascists"
Edited on Wed Jul-19-06 12:48 PM by greenman3610
but then there's "Christers" and the
perrenial "Snake Handlers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's easier to call foreigners fascists than people in your town
The Republicans get away with "Islamofascists" when they're talking about people who we mainly see when something violent happens on TV; but when you call someone who goes to a church in your town a Christian fascist, people are liable to say "fascist? Of course not. If they don't have brown shirts and armbands, they can't be fascists. Why, my children used to go to the same school as theirs". It's a big leap in perception required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It would be easier to teach lobotomised gorillas to solve algebraic
equations using the quadratic formula.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why TF is there a "Are you a slacker mom" ad at the bottom?
Seems that google is being... evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC