Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So if our tankers are refueling Israeli jets in air are we participants

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 09:20 AM
Original message
So if our tankers are refueling Israeli jets in air are we participants
in this slaughter? Can we stay above the frey so to speak? We are active participants it would seem so every bit as guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes we're particiants. Supplying fuel, planes, bombs, whatever.
Also tons of vetoes in the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Funding/supplying their every wish thus assuring a phenomenal kill ratio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. YES! Just another war crime for the Bush Regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why Do You Think They Bomb Us?
we tried the same thing in WWI and WWII. Oh, let's not join the war, but let's help our friends, give them supplies and so forth.

Well, the Germans blew up the Lusitania and tried to get Mexico to invade us, the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.

al Queda brought down the World Trade Center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why was the vice running wargames on that particular day?? This
has always bothered me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Mid air refueling was invented specifically to refuel...........
.....Israeli aircraft during one of the middle east wars - the 6 day war I think - but don't quote me on exactly which war.

The issue at the time was no country would allow US airplanes to land if they were in route to or in support of Israel. So the US simply developed mid-air refueling. Now it's a standard of operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Have you ever seen the movie Dr. Strangelove...
Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb?

The opening scene shows a B-52 bomber being fueled from a tanker in mid-air.

The movie was filmed in 1963. Mid-air refueling has been around since the '50s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Just had to look this one up...

'In-flight refueling was one way to set airborne endurance records.
The Atlantic-Fokker X-2A "Question Mark" stayed aloft for seven days
in January of 1929, refueling 42 times in the air. Because radio
communication was unreliable at this time, the pilots in the two
planes communicated by notes dropped to the ground and by hand signals,
flashlight signals, ground panels, and messages written on blackboards
carried in the planes.'
Source: http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Evolution_of_Technology/refueling/Tech22G1.htm

Mid-air refueling caught on GoogleEarth:
http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2006/06/kc135_caught_re.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Double "Whoa!"
Thanks for the shocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Nowhere Near True, Ma'am
Edited on Sat Jul-15-06 11:32 AM by The Magistrate
Experiments in the practice on a small scale were successful before the Second World War, though it did not feature in that conflict. It was a standard practice of all air forces of any size during the fifties, to provide adequate range for bombers tasked with inter-continental operations, and loiter time for fighters, and has remained an essnetial element of air force operations everywhere from then down to the present day. Its development had absolutely nothing to do with U.S. and Israeli relations or co-operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. In 1935, the Curtis Robin airplane "Miss Ole Miss" was
refueled mid-air in order to set a world endurance record.

http://www.meridianairport.com/history.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. 1935 in Meridian, Mississippi. Endurance record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Nonsense
It started in the 50s to support SAC and long range attacks on the Soviet Union. It was in active use during Vietnam as well for USAF and USN tactical aircraft.

Its not clear that the IAF aircraft have refueling capability and that their pilots are trained to do it. Its not easy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Apparently I grossly misunderstood but I thank everyone.............
....for correcting me.

I'm going to look into this a little more because I distinctly remember the USA refueling planes in mid-air on the way to Israel and there were some problems with the refueling.

Anyway, thank you all for bringing my attention to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHH Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. I would be surprised if they need to refuel they are not flying that far
from their base. their ammo and bombs do come from US and spare parts.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. You mean the Israelis aren't taking transpolar routes to Lebanon?
:rofl: (Some DU threads show a better grade of pot than I seem to get.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. We're WHAT?
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. *are* refueling? Do you mean someone says they are?
Edited on Sat Jul-15-06 11:43 AM by muriel_volestrangler
Or did you mean to say "if our tankers were refueling Israeli jets"? I can't find anything anywhere saying US tankers are refueling Israeli jets in the air. As others have said, there wouldn't seem to be a need for it anyway.

Unless someone says the US is refueling Israeli jets, then your statement of "we are active participants" would seem to be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Whether we are refueling Israeli planes or not
I would assume that the Pentagon was intimately briefed on the actions the Israelis intended to take in Lebannon and gave them the green light. Bush may look like he's spaced out at the G-8 summit and doesn't care what happens and is above the frey, but I think he is intimately linked to this, at least through foreknowledge and approval. With the U.S. having so many forces in Iraq between both the Iranian and Syrian borders, the Israelis would not take the risk of surprising the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Is there any truth to this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC