Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So WHY are more countries pulling out of iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:27 PM
Original message
So WHY are more countries pulling out of iraq?
S Korea has just announced 2300 will be pulled out. That's the latest.

Why are more and more being pulled out? Self-interest? Pointless war? Wanna save the pawns for a bigger target if things get too rough? (how's that for a scary thought? Unlike the US, the rest of the world remembers history...)


But Poland (who I ain't forgetting) is still staying, whatever that implies...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Poland's leaders are probably being paid off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Nothing would surprise me
Why kill your people for oil that you won't get any of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not a big enough bribe being offered by the bush cabal
I guess the tax cuts for the RICH are starting to hurt the war on terror!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Short answer: They hate freedom
Or they're more interested in keeping their citizens alive and their governments functioning than they are in trying to prop up George's Bad Decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because the whole "coalition:" was a bullshit arrangement to start with
The countries that participated were PAID to sacrifice a few on their soldiers, so that *² could look like he had world-support.Like any "deal", they either wanted to renegotiate for more cash, or the "lease" ended and they are headed homw now.

Some of the "soldiers" sent were not even involved in any fighting. I remember a story about one group who had BODYGUARDS so that they would not be hurt.. That does not sound like a coalition of the willing to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. don't forget these guys....
Edited on Fri Dec-30-05 01:53 PM by stillcool47
BRITISH AMERICAN SECURITY INFORMATION COUNCIL
BASIC RESEARCH REPORT
A Fistful of Contractors:
The Case for a Pragmatic Assessment of
Private Military Companies in Iraq
By David Isenberg Research Report 2004.4 September 2004 British-American Security Information Council

Recruiting personnel from around the world
PMCs are employing personnel from several countries, not just the United States. Contractors from Britain, Nepal, Chile, Ukraine, Israel, South Africa and Fiji, are doing a wide variety of tasks in Iraq but the common link is helping, in one way or another, to provide security.
According to David Claridge, managing director of Janusian, Iraq has boosted British military companies' revenues from £200m ($320m) before the war to over £1bn, making security by far Britain's most lucrative post-war export to Iraq.36 More than 1,500 South Africans are believed to be in Iraq under contract to various PMCs, including members of the South African Police Services’ elite task force and former members of the South African National Defence Force. Reportedly some active members are resigning from the SANDF to go to Iraq.37 All South African security companies working outside the country are required by law to register with the National Conventional Arms Control Committee (NCACC), headed by
Minister of Education Kader Asmal. It has also been reported that PMCs have illegally hired, in violation of a ban on Indian citizens traveling to Iraq, 1,500 ex-combat Indian troops as private guards to protect installations in Iraq.38 In addition, the Pakistani media has reported that authorities there have stopped U.S. civil and military contractors from recruiting Pakistani ex-servicemen for carrying out non-combatant security operations in Iraq. Two illegal recruitment facilities being used by U.S. contractors to recruit the retired security personnel in Lahore and Rawalpindi were reportedly shut down.39 Security firms are also believed to be employing veterans of anti-insurgency conflicts in Colombia and Algeria and former soldiers who fought in the Russian government’s war in Chechnya.40 News reports also suggest about 100 Australians, including about 40 former SAS troops, are guarding corporate managers and infrastructure projects.41



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Mission's Accomplished (again)

and we have a functioning, secure democracy in place

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. It just isn't the cause celebre that it used to be.



The Bush regime marketed it as the "Global War on Tairism". The veneer has worn off. The world now sees it as the "BFEE Oil Grab".





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC