I'm not a fan of Alexa as I have already made known. I do not think very much of their rankings either since they are based on who has an Alexa toolbar installed.
Here is Alexa's explanation of the percentages being quoted
"Reach measures the number of users. Reach is typically expressed as the percentage of all Internet users who visit a given site. So, for example, if a site like yahoo.com has a reach of 28%, this means that if you took random samples of one million Internet users, you would on average find that 280,000 of them visit yahoo.com. Alexa expresses reach as number of users per million. Alexa's one-week and three-month average reach are measures of daily reach, averaged over the specified time period. The reach rank is a ranking of all sites based solely on their reach. The three-month changes are determined by comparing a site's current reach and reach rank with its values from three month ago."
Reach rank is a big factor here and may be a bit misleading when it comes to actually traffic numbers. It seemed that most of the rw sites traffic numbers were up and down but basically in a consistent range.
"Could it be that Internet users are getting tired of political sites in general? Maybe so. But
http://moveon.org is up 13 percent in the same period."
This actually doesn't prove anything. Look at moveon's traffic numbers they are okay but not exactly domninating. Also DU is down 9%. And Dialykos is down 10%. DU get about 10 times more traffic than moveon and dailykos gets about 30 times(though those numbers are according to Alexa so who knows how vaild they really are). Some good news with a caveat, freerepublic's numbers are down 19% and their traffic looks like it has ebbed in the last 6 months. Again these are Alexa figures so who the hell knows how accurate they are.
Drudge and the rest of the rw go up and down. Their charts actually look like the needle getting pegged on a lie detector test. :evilgrin:
This does annoy me though. No investigation beyond a cursory one to prove the results that were desired in the first place.
So the moral of the story is it appears some political websites are losing traffic to non-political websites but a much more in depth investigation is needed.