Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Red light cameras -you own the vehicle, not driving it, you get the ticket

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:21 PM
Original message
Red light cameras -you own the vehicle, not driving it, you get the ticket
Council Bluffs Woman Says She Was Ticketed When She Wasn't Driving
Red-Light Cameras Capture SUV Running Light

POSTED: 10:55 pm EDT June 27, 2006
UPDATED: 10:56 pm EDT June 27, 2006

COUNCIL BLUFFS, Iowa -- A woman who wasn't driving her vehicle wants to know why she was ticketed for running a red light in Council Bluffs.

Officials said that there is a glitch in the city's new red-light photo enforcement law. If a driver's name is on the vehicle title, he or she is liable when that vehicle runs the light.

The camera shows Margie Guy's dark-colored SUV running a red light, according to Council Bluffs City Attorney Richard Wade. Guy was ticketed, but she said she wasn't driving.

"Don't live there, don't work there, have no reason to be over there," Guy said.

Guy's husband works in Council Bluffs, and she can only assume he was driving the vehicle. She doesn't think it's fair that she was targeted without any evidence that she was driving.

"If she actually owns the vehicle, if she's one of the co-owners, she is financially responsible, and that's all we're talking about here is financial responsibility," Wade said.

http://www.local6.com/news/9436751/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah,that's the ticket.
You own the car,you pay the fine. Works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the problem is that it goes on your driving record...
whether you did it or not. That can make a difference in your insurance rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Exactly.
I can't see it actually standing up in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Not around here it doesn't...
At least not to my knowledge.

You have to pay the fine, yes...but you don't get any points like you would've if a cop had stopped you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. No, it does not go against your driving record.
At least not here in Georgia. I got one of those tickets, so I can attest to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Friendly Fascism! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yeah,I hate the way the fascists jump red lights.
Killing people and stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Good thing the electric all seeing eye watches for Big Brother!
Keep me safe from EVERYTHING! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. privacy issues aside it's stupid on the part of all
He shouldn't have run a red light.

and

Red lights exist for public safety reasons.

Just hanging a camera up there and snapping pictures doesn't make the intersection any safer. It's law enforcement laziness, and it's absurd. Either you exist to enforce public safety (i.e., pull over the red light offender immediately) or you exist to find new and improved ways to collect revenue.

As Wade said - this isn't about public safety, it's about finance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. so who has to go to traffic school?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just take it to trial...the biggest jury that is allowed
They'll drop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. UNENFORCIBLE if it is contested. Happened to me.
I got a ticket for a Violation on a car I owned that was driven by my ex-fiance before she got ownership (as in paid me for it) of the vehicle. I called the Police Chief and he told me to contest it--that the Moving Violation has to be issued to the Operator of the vehicle. The cops know it's not enforcible but they figure most people will just pay it.

I took a day off work, went to court to protest the ticket, repossessed my vehicle from that wench and told her she can drive it again when she pays me for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Woo-Hoo!!!
Give me a rent-a-car!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. how about if the car was stolen?
"If she actually owns the vehicle, if she's one of the co-owners, she is financially responsible, and that's all we're talking about here is financial responsibility," should still hold, right? Makes sense to me. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. In Germany the cameras get your smiling mug right behind the wheel.
Got me a couple times where it drops down to 120 km/hr.

Don't we have the same tech here?

I like the idea of using cameras for this purpose. In MD we have FAR too many police officers just harassing citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. In Germany if the
face doesn't match the registered owner you could get out of the ticket. Some kids went joy riding with pig masks on and they couldn't do squat. Lol might be fun here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC