Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keeping public in dark is what's 'disgraceful'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:45 AM
Original message
Keeping public in dark is what's 'disgraceful'
It is highly unlikely that reports about the Bush administration's secret monitoring of international banking transactions were news to the world's terror organizations.

On the contrary, it has long been known that government officials target the transfer of money to locate, and in some cases prosecute, terror groups. Publication by several news organizations of the secret monitoring project involving a clearinghouse for international money transfers could not have been terribly damaging to U.S. efforts to fight terrorists

But the Bush administration, awash in bad news, is attacking The New York Times for writing about the program, accusing it of "disgraceful reporting," undermining the war on terrorism and endangering Americans. That's absurd, but the administration hopes to make political points by attacking the Times as a liberal bastion that doesn't care about the safety of the United States.

Attacking the Times — but pointedly not The Wall Street Journal, which also reported on the secret program — plays well in conservative political circles. This administration, one of the most secretive and grasping in history, reacts in fury when its questionable tactics are exposed.

http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/stories/06/28times_edit.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Afterall whose fucking government is it anyway? Shouldn't we know
Edited on Wed Jun-28-06 09:47 AM by lonestarnot
what they hell we are paying them for and what they are up to in spending our hard earned slave labor peanuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You would think
they owe we the people the explanation... Telling a few members of Congress is not informing The Congress and that is what people also need to see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. the guilty always squeals the loudest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. If anyone wanted an example of "fake outrage", need to look no further
than the Bush administration and their reaction to the NYTimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I almost laugh when I see them
get upset about leaks... They are the Leakers, Liars and Thieves....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC