Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New post may signal a thaw on warming

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 06:42 AM
Original message
New post may signal a thaw on warming
Edited on Sun Jun-25-06 06:46 AM by MaineDem
I never heard about this appointment on Monday. The Bush administration investigating global warming???

WASHINGTON — William Brennan spent the early part of his career cleaning out a tanker's bilge. But his new job might be tougher, as he coordinates federal research into climate change, one of the country's most hotly contested subjects. Brennan, a Castine native, worked on merchant marine and commercial fishing vessels early in his career. He earned several college degrees studying the oceans.

And he rose through government posts from Maine commissioner of marine resources to a top post at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The agency announced Monday that the 54-year-old Brennan became the acting director of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program. The post coordinates $2 billion in research spread across 13 federal agencies.

...

President Bush campaigned in 2000 to regulate heat-trapping carbon dioxide emissions but reversed that position in office by arguing it would stifle economic growth.

http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/state/060625climate.shtml

Were they shamed into this by Al Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. They must be taking it seriously at last.
One can only deny the undeniable for so long...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. I am inclined to think it is a move so the bushco* boys can point and say
hey look what we done when more than likely behind the scenes they will do everything in their power to skew the results of any work done. I don't trust 'em especially in the world I have to live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. We just might be on the verge of recreating Mars' environment
Edited on Sun Jun-25-06 07:01 AM by cornermouse
here on Earth. Given the fact that China is quickly becoming the major polluter in the eternal quest for the almighty dollar and world supremacy, I'm not sure if there's anything we can do to stop it.

Maybe someone clued George in on the fact that we don't have any alternative planets to move to yet and if we ever do, they are unlikely to be comfortable to live on until well after Bush dies from old age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalArkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It doesn't make any difference to the wealthy. Why?
Let's say the temp rises to a normal of 100 in the day and 85 at night. Sure there would be a problem growing food. But what does it matter. So a tomato costs $15.00, no problem. So gas is %25.00 a gallon, no problem. See they can afford it. The consequences of global warming foes not bother the rich..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Consequences will bother the rich if they burn this planet up
ala Mars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Part of me believes that the human race has been going
back and forth between Earth & Mars forever.

We wreck one as we are shedding microbes of it all over the surface of the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I think that would be Venus.
Venus is the planet with the runaway greenhouse effect. It has a heavy atmosphere composed of 96% CO2 with surface temps of 900° F.

Mars' atmosphere has roughly the same percentage of CO2, but the atmosphere is so thin that the surface temp remains at around -81° F

As bad as the current CO2 emissions are on this planet, we are nowhere near getting to where Venus is. Even during the geological periods with the highest CO2 levels, they were only about 20 times what the are today, which is still only a concentration of .5%.

To recreate Mars' environment here on Earth, we'd have to suck out about 99% of the current atmosphere.

Sorry to be picky, but I'm somewhat anal on scientific accuracy. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. No problem.
I'm not strong on science and I'm not a Greenie either, but I can see that if we don't change our approach to the environment, we clearly are headed toward becoming a dead planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh goodie..they're going to research a scientifically uncontested issue...
Why don't they research the links between cigarettes and cancer while they're at it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. A two billion dollar agency to "catapult the propaganda"
No good will come from this. How could it? It is the Bush* Administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. My first thought exactly
I no longer believe anything good comes from "their" gov't.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. They need a new guy to fudge the reports?
The last one kind of blew it... Getting caught with the white-out and all.

Didn't look good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. During the 60's and 70's it was
OMG the ice age is coming. So just maybe global warming isnt a bad thing. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC