Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is it important that the Democrats win the next election ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 11:25 PM
Original message
Why is it important that the Democrats win the next election ?
It's just another election, right? It's not like the Republic depends on it, right? Why is it such a big deal? Is the world going to end if the Republicans win the next election? Does it really matter who wins in November? How will your life be different? Do you really think your life will be better if the Democrats win? Why have you attached such significance to the upcoming election? Is it because you just want to win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's about the war in Iraq
No victory, no end to the war.

It'll be a guarantee of at least two more years of bloodshed in Iraq. With the Democrats, the issue is disputed, but with the Republicans, there is no chance for debate. None whatsoever. In fact, they will probably escalate the bombing campaign and the number of troops in a bid to break the resistance through sheer firepower on a platform of "bludgeoning the Iraqis into submission."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I want things to change.
We are all criminals now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. READ THIS ---- MEMORIZE THIS!!!`
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/helderheid/87

snippet:

- At least 9 Congressional Progressive Caucus Members would become Committee Chairmen or Chairwomen
- An additional 35 Congressional Progressive Caucus Members would become Subcommittee Chairmen or Chairwomen.

The following Progressive Caucus Members would become Committee Chairs:

- Congressman George Miller, Chairman of Education and Workforce Committee
- Congressman Barney Frank, Chairman of Financial Services
- Congressman Henry Waxman, Chairman of Government Reform
- Congressman Bennie Thompson, Chairman of Homeland Security Committee
- Congressman Tom Lantos, Chairman of International Relations Committee
- Congressman John Conyers, Chairman of Judiciary Committee
- Congresswoman Louise Slaughter, Chairwoman of Rules Committee
- Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez, Chairwoman of Small Business Committee
- Congressman Charles Rangel, Chairman of Ways and Means Committee

The following Progressive Caucus Members would become Subcommittee Chairs:
- Appropriations Subcommittees -- Congresswomen Rosa DeLauro and Marcy Kaptur and Congressmen John Olver, Jose Serrano, and Ed Pastor
- Armed Services Subcommittee, Congressman Neil Abercrombie
- Education and Workforce Subcommittees, Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey and Congressman Dennis Kucinich
- Energy and Commerce Subcommittees, Congressman Ed Markey and Congresswomen Jan Schakowsky and Hilda Solis
- Financial Services Subcommittee, Congresswoman Maxine Waters and Congressman Luis Gutierrez
- Government Reform Subcommittees, Congresswoman Diane Watson and Congressmen Dennis Kucinich, Elijah Cummings, Danny Davis of Illinois, and William "Lacy" Clay
- International Relations Subcommittee, Congressman Donald Payne
- Judiciary Subcommittees, Congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee and Congressmen Jerry Nadler and Melvin Watt
- Interior Subcommittees, Congressmen Raul Grijalva and Tom Udall and Congresswoman Donna Christensen
- Rules Subcommittees, Congressman Jim McGovern
- Small Business Subcommittees, Congresswomen Madeleine Bordallo
- Transportation and Infrastructure, DeFazio, Filner, Holmes-Norton, and C. Brown
- Ways and Means Subcommittees, Congressmen Pete Stark, Jim McDermott, and John Lewis of Georgia



Folks, it is that serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bingo. We have a winner!!!
Edited on Thu Jun-22-06 11:34 PM by Emit
Thank you.

This is it, helderheid, and I have printed this out to pass around to others who are volunteering in my area and to voters.

We have to break the monopoly -- restore the balance in the branches of our government.

This is so important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. We need the government to get back to doing it's job
and get back to the basics......and to do that we have to remove the cancerous plague known as the neocon facist repugs.....at least with a Dem led Congress monkey boy will not be able to have his bills walked through Congress......oversight will return and investigations will begin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. To save the greatest democratic republic human history has known . . .
from those who consider the Constitution just "a piece of paper".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. IMPORTANT: Senator Pat "cover-up" Roberts will lose his committee chair
You know, the guy who keeps stonewalling phase II investigation into how Bush got us into war. The guy who covers for Bushco and Repugs at every turn.

If Dems take back the senate, the Bush/RNC house of card will fall.

The congress can actually address real issues, rather than flag burning, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Another good point -- I'll add that to my 'list' n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Go back to 2000 - would 9-11 have happened?
I doubt it - Gore would have read the Hart-Rudman Report on Global Terror when it was handed to him on Jan 30, 2001.

If Gore still wanted to get tough in Iraq as he said in his campaign, he would have gotten an IWR from the congress and would have ADMINISTERED IT HONESTLY. He would have let the weapons inspectors do their jobs unhindered, and the diplomacy that was working to get Saddam to leave peacefully would have been realized. UN peacekeeping forces would be in place for setting up a transitional government till Iraq could hold its elections.

Go back to 2004 - Kerry would have immediately brought in the UN and NATO, called a summit of all the neighboring countries' leaders and the leaders of the insuergencies to work out differences, and called a summit of the world's religious leaders to come together to seek a greater peace amongst all religions and especially the Islamic religious leaders who never wanted their religion used for violent purpose.

Good chance the bulk of our troops would ahve been home by now, with a smaller force still in Iraq, working with UN and NATO and training Iraqi forces at the permanent bases we turned over to them,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC