Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here are the 42 "Democrats" who voted yes (picked out from main list)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:54 AM
Original message
Here are the 42 "Democrats" who voted yes (picked out from main list)
Barrow
Bean
Berman
Berry
Bishop (GA)
Boren
Boswell
Boucher
Cardoza
Case
Chandler
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Cramer
Cuellar
Davis (TN)
Edwards
Etheridge
Gordon
Green, Gene
Herseth
Higgins
Holden
Kind
Larsen (WA)
Lipinski
Lynch
Marshall
Matheson
McCarthy
McIntyre
Melancon
Moore (KS)
Peterson (MN)
Ross
Salazar
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Spratt
Taylor (MS)
Thompson (MS)

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll288.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. The two dems from Mississippi
may be motivated by the possibility of intense smearing by the gop if they voted against the sham resolution. Not getting them off the hook but there are dynamics involved. Its hard enough to get elected down here with that (D) by your name. I'll vote for Taylor again this year. I'll vote for every democrat regardless of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. That's true of most of the list. Not Cuellar, though. From Texas.
He's the rep who blatantly stole the primary nomination two years ago from Ciro Rodriquez. May or may not have won it honestly this time, I don't know.But he's a Republican Bush appointee who calls himself a Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep - most are Southern and mid-Western Dems
who have nothing but Reich-wing media back in their home states.

Sad that there's no real news outlets in many of these states (including mine).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I'm envious of people with one of these Dems
Mine's a Republican fascist. It would be nice to feel that I had some representation on at least some topics. Instead, I have a rep who successfully argued that his primary opponent shouldn't be elected because he'd been too nice to Democrats in his career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, that is true. I don't have a Dem house representative, either
But my Republican's not too bad. He actually voted against the IWR in 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yay, lynch mob!!!
Get em! lol, we're never taking control back. Can't stop shooting each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. So, what would you have us do?
Send 'em flowers and candy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Send White Flags to them with a note attached
Please find enclosed a check for $0.00 to go toward your re-election campaign. Thank you for YOUR support in helping us Reclaim America.

Love, from your always supportive Democratic Base
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. I like that idea!
Not just for this...and not just to members of our party.

But so many votes are so bad for America that with rewording that could be a great response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. It's certainly inexpensive and do-able!
A yard of white fabric comes at between $3-$6 depending on where you get it. Take some wooden shich kabob sticks (99 cents). A little glue, scissors, stamp and evelope. Printing up the "message" on a label template is a snap!

I'm serious about. :) We should be calling these THE WHITE FLAG DEMOCRATS. They surrender and vote with the GOP waaaayyyy to often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Missy Bean!
I'm shocked! Utterly shocked! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oregon is once
again ahead of the pack. Good going OR 1,3,4,5. Two is a republicant and useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. to the hall of shame with them, america will prevail imo...
but not with republican ideologies :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Did you see the title on that Bill?:
"Declaring that the United States will prevail in the Global War on Terror, the struggle to protect freedom from the terrorist adversary"

:rofl: WTF? So these dipshits think they can legislate a war victory now? I've never seen anything so fucking stupid in all my...oh wait, scratch that, Bush is more stupid than this. But not by much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. So if we don't win....does that mean someone will have broken the law?
Edited on Fri Jun-16-06 11:19 AM by mycritters2
Who would we arrest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. LOL - That means Bush will have broken the law. (Rummy too)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Arrest * first for crimes against the constitigution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Cue scary music..
Smarmy voiceover: "The Democrats don't want the United States prevailing in the War on Terra and actually voted against protecting American freedom!"

Cue happy music..

Enthusiastic voiceover: "The Republicans are confident the United States will prevail in the War on Terra and will always vote to protect American freedom!"

The point is, this crap is 100% political and is primarily a sound bite generator. What's worse, it'll probably work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Thanks. These guys are doing us no good, (and gals)
There are times when being popular or re elected don't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
17. And people wonder why the Dems are known for not being unified.
It's because of idiots like the ones on this list...

God damn it. How many times are they going to fucking cave before we finally have enough?

With an opposition party like this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
20. Whats wrong with taking a stand against global terrorism?

:shrug:

Its just a resolution, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. I guess the devil is in the details.


Declaring that the United States will prevail in the Global War on Terror,
the struggle to protect freedom from the terrorist adversary.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. HYDE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on 

RESOLUTION
Declaring that the United States will prevail in the Global
War on Terror, the struggle to protect freedom from
the terrorist adversary.

Whereas the United States and its allies are engaged in a
Global War on Terror, a long and demanding struggle
against an adversary that is driven by hatred of American
values and that is committed to imposing, by the use
of terror, its repressive ideology throughout the world;

Whereas for the past two decades, terrorists have used violence
in a futile attempt to intimidate the United States;

Whereas it is essential to the security of the American people
and to world security that the United States, together
with its allies, take the battle to the terrorists and to
those who provide them assistance;

Whereas the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and other terrorists failed to
stop free elections in Afghanistan and the first popularly elected
President in that nation’s history has taken office;

Whereas the continued determination of Afghanistan, the
United States, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
will be required to sustain a sovereign, free, and secure
Afghanistan;

Whereas the steadfast resolve of the United States and its
partners since September 11, 2001, helped persuade the
government of Libya to surrender its weapons of mass
destruction;

Whereas by early 2003 Saddam Hussein and his criminal,
Ba’athist regime in Iraq, which had supported terrorists,
constituted a threat against global peace and security
and was in violation of mandatory United Nations Security
Council Resolutions;

Whereas the mission of the United States and its Coalition
partners, having removed Saddam Hussein and his regime
from power, is to establish a sovereign, free, secure,
and united Iraq at peace with its neighbors;

Whereas the terrorists have declared Iraq to be the central
front in their war against all who oppose their ideology;

Whereas the Iraqi people, with the help of the United States
and other Coalition partners, have formed a permanent,
representative government under a newly ratified constitution;

Whereas the terrorists seek to destroy the new unity government
because it threatens the terrorists’ aspirations for
Iraq and the broader Middle East;

Whereas United States Armed Forces, in coordination with
Iraqi security forces and Coalition and other friendly
forces, have scored impressive victories in Iraq including
finding and killing the terrorist leader Abu Musab al-
Zarqawi;

Whereas Iraqi security forces are, over time, taking over from
United States and Coalition forces a growing proportion
of independent operations and increasingly lead the fight
to secure Iraq;

Whereas the United States and Coalition servicemembers and
civilians and the members of the Iraqi security forces and
those assisting them who have made the ultimate sacrifice
or been wounded in Iraq have done so nobly, in the
cause of freedom; and

Whereas the United States and its Coalition partners will
continue to support Iraq as part of the Global War on
Terror: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) honors all those Americans who have taken
an active part in the Global War on Terror, whether
as first responders protecting the homeland, as
servicemembers overseas, as diplomats and intelligence officers, or in other roles;

(2) honors the sacrifices of the United States
Armed Forces and of partners in the Coalition, and
of the Iraqis and Afghans who fight alongside them,
especially those who have fallen or been wounded in
the struggle, and honors as well the sacrifices of
their families and of others who risk their lives to
help defend freedom;

(3) declares that it is not in the national security
interest of the United States to set an arbitrary
date for the withdrawal or redeployment of United
States Armed Forces from Iraq;

(4) declares that the United States is committed
to the completion of the mission to create a
sovereign, free, secure, and united Iraq;

(5) congratulates Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki
and the Iraqi people on the courage they have
shown by participating, in increasing millions, in the
elections of 2005 and on the formation of the first
government under Iraq’s new constitution;

(6) calls upon the nations of the world to promote
global peace and security by standing with the
United States and other Coalition partners to support
the efforts of the Iraqi and Afghan people to
live in freedom; and

(7) declares that the United States will prevail
in the Global War on Terror, the noble struggle to
protect freedom from the terrorist adversary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. meh
we are all republicans now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC