Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I get it now: the Death of Zarq, Bush's double-super-secret Baghdad visit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 11:59 AM
Original message
I get it now: the Death of Zarq, Bush's double-super-secret Baghdad visit
it's all timed to counteract the negative press associated with the 2,500 KIA milestone. How much you want to bet they've had Zarq's body on ice for weeks, just waiting for the right moment to thaw his ass out and stick him under some rubble? Never mind that, according to our own generals, less than 10% of the insurgency are foreign al Qaeda fighters. Never mind that the violence in Iraq continues unabated, despite the corporate media's predictable attempt to put the "we've turned the corner" lipstick on the Iraq-war pig yet again. More theater of the absurd, brought to you by Bushco and TV News-o-tainment Corp. Symbolism over Substance R Us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. bingo.
that's where my thinking was at too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes,
and the corporate media is doing their best to either hide or ignore the fact that BushCo could of nailed Zarq back in 2002, but needed him for propaganda reasons. Saddam is harboring terrorists along with WMD's. Right. Just like Jeb Bush was harboring Mohamed Atta prior to 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep--with Cuba controlling the airspace from the border to Gainesville,
and from the Keys to Orlando.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Seems like a good reason to
invade Cuba to me. Think of all the cigars and rum we could gain by doing so, and more contracts for Hailiburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. We'd be greeted as liberators!
Grateful Cubans would stand cheering in the streets, tossing candy and flowers to smiling US troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. not sure about Zarq on Ice -- but your post jibes with this one
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2680168

i'm wondering how we can ever get back to a world where truth and rationality are expected in public discourse. is it too late? have we turned a corner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. We turned that corner in 1948, when the Soviets consolidated
Edited on Thu Jun-15-06 12:21 PM by smoogatz
their hold on Eastern Europe and the Republicans started to accuse (the late) FDR of having committed treason at Yalta. They're still trying to eradicate FDR from the political landscape. That's all they care about--power, power, power, and returning the country to the "golden age" of 1932, before FDR took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. damn good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. It also marked a shift in rhetoric . You won't hear " Iraq war" anymore
from now on it the "global terror war with a battle being fought in Baghdad".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Wow. The "GTWWABBFIB!" Kinda gets ya right here....
...dunnit? Chokes me up, I tellya, thinking of all those brave young Americans fighting the GTWWABBFIB.

I imagine it being pronounced something like 'git-wab-fib'. Inspiring phonemes! A grabber if there ever was one, alrighty.

ironically,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Naw, it's just the "the war on terror" for short. No more "Iraq" anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think we will have to outlaw the Republican Party first.
According to my reasoning any society or organization that is anti-Constitution should be outlawed for treason, but that's just my thinking. No one else seems to have come to this conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bush has the sheeple believing that EVERY Aye-rab is terrorist.
The sheeple don't mind being lied to when it fits in with their own very narrow, limited world view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC