Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Global Corporate Fascist Oil Gouging Outsourced Inflation Is Good For You!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 10:02 PM
Original message
Global Corporate Fascist Oil Gouging Outsourced Inflation Is Good For You!


Increase in Consumer Prices Raises Fears of Inflation
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/jan-june06/inflation_06-14.html
A Labor Department report released Wednesday shows an increase in consumer prices due to significant raises in energy and gas costs, prompting concerns that the Federal Reserve will again raise interest rates to fight inflation.

RAY SUAREZ: The government's latest report showed inflation is continuing to rise in consumer prices, which have now grown by just over 4 percent within the past year. Energy and gas prices were a significant part of the increase. So how are businesses coping with rising prices? And what do those price rises mean for the wider economy? (with Alice Rivlin, a former vice-chair of the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors, she's now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, where she follows U.S. fiscal and monetary policy)

Inflation not as high as the 1970s

RAY SUAREZ: Well, Alice Rivlin, from what you just heard from these businessmen, how does this extrapolate out to the wider economy?

ALICE RIVLIN: Well, I think we've heard some of the worst from these two gentlemen because their businesses are fuel-intensive, especially trucking. And if the oil price stays where it is or continues to rise, which is not unlikely, these kinds of stories are going to be there.

But the rest of the economy is not totally dependent on energy. We are less dependent on energy, actually, than we were in the 1970s, BECAUSE WE DON'T MAKE AS MUCH STUFF. Much more of our economy is service-oriented and NOT SUCH A BIG CONSUMER OF ENERGY.

TRANSLATION: All those outsourced manufacturing jobs = less energy used to make things we don't make in the U.S anymore more = more no-benefits/service/tempslave/unemployed workers who can't afford gas and depend on the low prices of cheap outsourced manufacturing products.

<>

RAY SUAREZ: But what about Mr. Zimmerman's example of not being able to on pass his rising cost to his customers because of the competitive environment? Are there a lot of manufacturers that at some point are going to have to raise their prices, and we just haven't seen that yet, that it will eventually send its shockwave through the economy?

ALICE RIVLIN: There are some, and that will likely happen. But PRODUCTIVITY increases have been very high, especially in manufacturing. THEY'RE GETTING MORE OUT OF THE INPUTS THAT THEY PUT IN AND OUT OF THEIR WORKERS. And it is isn't likely that we're going to have great inflation in manufacturing or, I think, anywhere else.

TRANSLATION: All those outsourced manufacturing jobs = less energy used to make things we don't make in the U.S anymore more = more no-benefits/service/tempslave/unemployed workers who can't afford gas and depend on the low prices of cheap outsourced manufacturing products.

RAY SUAREZ: Like tumbling dominoes, Mr. Quinn's customers, who have taken his fuel surcharge, are probably charging their customers more, but they're doing this in an atmosphere of slowly growing wages. Are these pains ones that will be felt at the household level, as well?

ALICE RIVLIN: To some extent, yes, but, except for food and energy, prices have been going up very slowly, accelerating a little bit in the last few months, but BASICALLY AT A PRETTY REASONABLE RATE.

TRANSLATION: At any less "reasonable" as rate, the American people might actually get really PISSED OFF.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. With props to Swamp Rat
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. So is inhaling cigars.....great post !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. .....and they might be
Chinese cigars


:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. WAKE UP !!
I am tired of watching this slow boat shit.

How hard do Yall need it kicked?

obviously. harder. I give you free reign OMM. You are so good with words..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hey didja notice: right when the "Made In China" dots were getting
connected and articles were on the front page...................Bring On The Mexicans!!!!!!!!!!

Same distraction they used in CA when the U.S got NAFTA'd.......... "Look folks, forget about outsourcing, here come the Mexicans to take your jobs"


Thanks Ripley, much obliged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. MADE IN VIETNAM got me...
Edited on Wed Jun-14-06 11:28 PM by Ripley
Americans wear cheap clothing and are DAMN FLAG-WaVING PROUD about It!!!

Forgot to include: We Won. Now I will go away....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. shivers from that condi pic
:scared: creepy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Swampy rocks
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. thanks
:blush:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. I worry more about the stupid FED
I think they did the same thing in 2000. When oil prices go up that causes inflation all through the economy as energy is an input into everything. This is a supply side cost push inflation. The FED has impact on the demand side by influencing money and credit demand. However, since the inflation is not caused by excess demand, this will reduce demand even further, leading to cascading job losses.

As when they increased rates in May 2000 (after gas prices had jumped by 30%) Job growth for 2000 was (in thousands) - 251; 125; 495; 294; 231; -32; 82; 48; 128; 8; 208; 100. So 1.4 million jobs created in the five months prior to the rate increase and 234,000 jobs created in the five months after. Smooth move ex-greenslax. Not that the rate increase cause all that slowdown in job growth, but it sure as fu$% didn't help!

Krugman has also written that 3% inflation is nothing to worry about.
http://www.pkarchive.org/global/tag.html

"Do we then really have deflation?

I think it's better to have an inflation rate of two or three percent and interest rates of five to six percent than to have no inflation at all.

Why?

When a recession comes, you have at least the choice to lower interest rates. The US had in 1991/92 a recession during which the Fed lowered the interest rates by six percentage points – from nine to three percent. And it wasn't even a very deep recession. The fact that we today, at the high point of the economic cycle, have practically no inflation, limits the alternatives for economic policy. One can hardly conceive what would happen now in the case of a crash in the stock markets. We don't have enough maneuvering room. Cutting interest rates makes the outlook more stable. Inflation should increase to one or two percent.

Shouldn't we tame inflation?

Britain had for years an inflation of two to three percent, the US had similar high rates for a while. You are right: who reaches an inflation of twelve percent will have problems. But who aims at two to three percent will be successful. Only hyperinflation can't be controled."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. "Increased Productivity" = we're screwed
The manipulation of the markets is enabled by the manipulators of lingo, like this chirpy woman on TeeVee tonight, so damn cheerful and using the euphemistic blather that makes it SOUND like it 's good for "us"-- but of course the "us" they mean is Global Corporate, Inc.

"The US had in 1991/92 a recession during which the Fed lowered the interest rates by six percentage points – from nine to three percent. And it wasn't even a very deep recession."

At that time Bushco. got their tax cuts. The firts week in office, Treasury Sec. Paul O'Neil was on TeeVee saying that "we" needed the tax cuts because manufacturers had oversupplied their warehouses.

The economy and the bullshit lingo they use to prop it up is a house of cards. At least O'Neil came out and said Give the people a tax rebate so they can buy the crap sitting in the warehouses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. Link to Robert Reich thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. Used ta be "Toxic Sludge Is Good For You"
Still is! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
14. Inflation is much worse now than in the 70's for average people.
In the 70's, people still got regular, decent raises. Everybody I know know has had stagnant income since Clinton left office, but the prices keep soaring!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC