Makes sense. We're mad at Iran so we bombed Pakistan.

[elehhhhna]

I'm starting to see the logic.

[deminks]

1. Not that I am paranoid or anything

I am sometimes, lol, but Sen. Kerry is in Pakistan today, too, touring the quake area.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060114/ap_on_re_as/south_asia_quake

[txindy]

2. It's what they do. Al Qaeda was in Afghanistan, so they attacked Iraq

If these idiots had been in charge on Dec. 7, 1941, they would've attacked Peru. Or maybe Ecuador. Because, you know, that's where the Japanese military was really based. :eyes:

[Lexingtonian]

3. 18 civilians, mostly women and children, killed

without warning or care, and Zawahiri probably not. According to LA Times article up.

In the War Against Terrorism, civilization seems to be losing big time.

[rodeodance]

4. we gotta go when that good intel takes us.

[LiberalEsto]

5. Kerry's in Pakistan now

wonder if that means anything?

[ChairmanAgnostic]

6. Don't Forget Poland! I would be interested in hearing Kerry after the trip

So, does it matter if the CIA launched the attack rather than the US military?
Does that make it better somehow? When 18 elderly men, women and children die?

[stillcool]

7. Just like those 'precision strikes' ...

before the 'official' Shock&Awe intended to kill Saddam. Thank heaven they were 'precision' and not 'targeted'...those targeted ones destroy whole cities.