Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Falwell: The Alito Juggernaut

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 08:39 AM
Original message
Falwell: The Alito Juggernaut
FALWELL CONFIDENTIAL
Insider weekly newsletter to The Moral Majority Coalition and
The Liberty Alliance http://www.moralmajority.com <http://www.moralmajority.com/>

Date: January 13, 2006
From: Jerry Falwell

THE ALITO JUGGERNAUT

It appears that Senate Democrats have given up the ship they hoped would sink President Bush’s nomination of Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The party’s alleged heavy hitters on the Senate Judiciary Committee took a belligerent tone in their initial questioning of Judge Alito, attempting to depict him as a right-wing fanatic. But their efforts were futile.

They attempted to show that Judge Alito’s association with a conservative Princeton alumni group proved that he was some kind of whacko.

Sen. Ted Kennedy said during the hearings that Judge Alito’s “affiliation with an organization that fought the admission of women into Princeton calls into question his appreciation for the need for full equality in this country.”

But this was typical empty bluster Mr. Kennedy, who is a strange choice to carry the torch of integrity for his party.

The folks at the Federalist Patriot nailed it when, referring to Sen. Kennedy, they illustrated what Judge Alito is NOT: “It’s not as if Judge Alito is a spoiled trust baby who got kicked out of Harvard for cheating. Nor is he a United States senator who got drunk, drove a young female campaign worker to her death, then chose not to report it to authorities until the next day, and then, only after calling his lawyer, concocting an alibi and developing a strategy to contain the political fallout.”

As they said in churches years ago, that’ll preach.

And let’s examine the facts. Records from the Princeton alumni group clearly show that Judge Alito was not actively involved with the group. Further, he stated over and over during the hearings that he had no actual recollection of the group or his relation to it. He suggested that, since he was a member of the Reserve Officer Training Corps, and the alumni group opposed the ouster of Princeton’s ROTC program, he might have joined for that reason.

Again and again, the Democrats looked befuddled as Judge Alito offered reasonable rejoinders to every vacant allegation they brought<. He remained rational and levelheaded throughout the proceedings, just as one would expect a Supreme Court jurist to behave.[br />
At the same time, the Democrats—lost in their monetary bond to the radical abortion-rights community that has so hysterically opposed Judge Alito—came off looking like irrational bullies.

I was so pleased to see Republican senators, including Sen. Orrin Hatch (Utah), Sen. Jeff Sessions (Ala.) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.) gallantly defending Judge Alito against the frantic attempts to brand him unfit for the High Court.

Sen. Hatch also stood up for Judge Alito regarding the Vanguard allegations, in which Judge Alito admitted that he made a mistake in initially working on the case before later recusing himself because he had invested in the company. Further, the American Bar Association investigated the issue and ultimately awarded Judge Alito with an excellent rating, with ethics officials finding no improper actions.

“You lived up to the law,” Sen. Hatch said, adding, “I don’t think you’ve been fairly treated.”

That’s the bottom line in the Alito hearings.

Judge Alito is a fine man and a brilliant jurist by all accounts. I don’t claim to know how he will vote on pivotal issues that will come to the Court. But I know that he will be a thoughtful and balanced jurist who does not look at the Constitution and see a rubbery document that he can sculpt to accommodate shifting social inclinations.

Bottom line: the Democrats need to allow an up or down vote on this worthy candidate.

-------------

Up yours Falwell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think he wrote this
it is too well-written. Must have been his staff. He's a jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think you're right, TG
It has too many three-syllable words. In fact, I'm not sure his base will be able to wade through it. SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC