Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has there ever been a fiscally responsible Republican President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
hopeisaplace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:44 AM
Original message
Has there ever been a fiscally responsible Republican President
Edited on Sat Jan-14-06 12:49 AM by hopeisaplace
in the US?
It just seems to me that this so called "fiscally conservative/responsible"
sales pitch that cons/repubs run is pure fiction?



edit: subject line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fiction.
Absolute falsehood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. How About Eisenhower?
I was awfully young when he was President but in my mind's eye he has always been the model of a Conservative (the acceptable kind) of Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He was not a conservative; he was moderate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He had his own foiables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's what I was gonna say
I was born just at the tail end of his presidency but it seems to me from what I've read, that he was the last repuke president to watch his spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. And Complain About The "Complex"
In his farewell speech, when he warned against the increasing power of the "Military Industrial Complex" he was indeed doing just that. He was warning us.

It always amazes me to go back and reread it too. Its as if he was suprised by its existance but had already resigned himself to defeat against it. Read his words, they are chilling to this day. In fact maybe I'll go find them and make a post out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. He came the closest, but remember, he was relatively apolitical
until he ran for president, and democrats wooed him too, to run as a dem. When he spent money it was during a time when we actually HAD some money. the immediate postwar time was a B O O M time, and we were on top of the world..
The postwar period was the perfect time to do all that building..People were sick and tired of rationing and scrimping and they were ready to see the government start spending money on THEM..instead of a war..

Eisenhower saw the inherent danger of the military industrial complex..and he warned us.. we ignored him/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. The Eisenhower administration wasn't bad. See here ...
There were federal on-budget surpluses in 1951 (Truman), 1956, 1957, and 1960. Nobody has been as bad as Reagan/Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopeisaplace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. thanks for the chart :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. He's the last Prez my Repub parents considered truly conservative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm Not Sure...But I've Read that Reagan and Bush41...
...both reneged on continuing to cut taxes, and had to raise taxes when they saw that their tax-cut policies were making the deficits far worse.

I guess, for Republican sheeple, and anti-tax-pro-poverty idiots, these two showed a sort of "fiscal responsibility".

Clinton called the Republicans out to put their money where their railing mouths were, and passed a sound budget reform, I believe, that was drafted but never put to work by the Republicans in congress, and it was funny that NOT ONE Republican voted with Clinton on this either as it passed!

I guess Republicans liked using the "Tax and Spend Democrats" to bolster the anger within their base for their votes, but now they've been in total power for the past 5 years, it's clear it's all been blather.

Republicans wouldn't know how to be fiscally responsible if they tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. You must be very young. Reagan & Bush1 were disasters even though
Bush1 raised taxes once. Ther have not been true conservative Republicans since the mid 1970s. Think of Howar Baker(TN) or Alan Simpson(WY). (google them)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Perhaps "Young" Regarding Presidential Politics...
...but I'm 43, so I'm not that young!

However, I admit, that I didn't much "feel" the effects of the Reagan/Bush administration since I lived abroad then.

However, I do remember that during Reagan/Bush's administration, Europe hated them--except for Thatcher.

I was then too afraid to tell any one that I was an American, as much negative American sentiment as there was then. I remember that the White House model in Maduradam, Holland, was "bombed" in protest of the Reagan/Bush foreign policies.

Yeah, it was that bad even in progressive-liberal Holland, although the majority of the elderly Dutch were infuriated, and incensed that this happened.

They are still DEEPLY grateful that the Americans came in and threw the Nazis out of Holland, and to this day, my parents-in-law speak no ill of America; their fondest memories were of American soldiers who, in spite of all the ravages of war, and death, and killing...could still offer the kindest smiles to them (they were children then) and give them chocolate (they were starving then) and a prized commodity--American chewing gum!

To this day, my father-in-law still talks about that one American soldier who looked tired, and filthy, but who smiled down at him, and he told me he asked this soldier "Gum-gum" and the American soldier didn't hesitate, but pulled out a pack of Wrigley's and gave it to him.

To this day, my father-in-law regrets he never knew this soldier's name.

Europeans haven't forgotten. They all still love, and admire the United States. They all think our country is the BEST country in the world, because it's true.

They just don't understand how an intelligent people like us, could vote for people like Bush/Cheney.

To be honest, neither do I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. not since Ike
after that, they became the party of the military industrial complex and started spending like drunken sailors on shore leave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopeisaplace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. rofl
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. Roosevelt... Teddy, that is.
He did jack up defense spending, but it was sustainable for the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. I think Herbert Hoover's "fiscal responsibility" elected FDR in 1932...
bu thats JMO.

Put mr down for Hoover (1928-1932)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. He was responsible, he was just wrong.
He tried to fix a depression by raising interest rates to keep gold in the US, which ended up taking money out of the economy, which was, basically, a bad move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. I'd vote for Calvin Coolidge
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
17. Lincoln maybe
I cant recall his economic platform though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hoover for sure.
He believed that doing nothing would get America out of the Depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
22. Also Nixon & Ford, much as you don't want to hear it.
I won't defend their other actions however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC