Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army's Payroll System Is Breaking Down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jon8503 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 06:10 AM
Original message
Army's Payroll System Is Breaking Down
Edited on Mon May-29-06 06:11 AM by Jon8503
G. I. Bills

Article Tools Sponsored By
By LAWRENCE J. KORB and PETER OGDEN
Published: May 29, 2006

Washington

IN the past few years, the United States Army has had to rely increasingly on financial incentives to recruit and retain soldiers. But even as the Army's finance and payroll system administers ever larger sums of money and a growing number of entitlements, it must also track the hundreds of thousands of Army, Army Reserve and Army National Guard personnel who are being moved in and out of Iraq, Afghanistan, South Korea and the Balkans.

The Army's payroll system, originally developed in the late 1970's, has never been under so much strain. And just when the Army needs it most, it is failing. The Government Accountability Office has announced that as of last September, flaws in the Army's system had resulted in $1.5 million in military debt on account of overpayments to close to 1,300 soldiers who were wounded or killed in action in Iraq and Afghanistan; as a result, many of these soldiers and their families have been hounded by government debt collectors. Simply forgiving this debt is not a long-term solution: unless the Pentagon moves quickly to overhaul the system and reorder its priorities, there will be many more problems in the future.

Breakdowns often occur when a soldier is killed in action or wounded severely enough to be sent off the battlefield. Although the Army's personnel office is informed that the soldier is dead or has been redeployed, the finance office becomes aware of this only if the proper paperwork is submitted — a step that frequently gets skipped in the rush to notify the soldier's family, collect and process his equipment, and otherwise expedite his return home. The finance office, therefore, continues to provide the soldier or his family a salary that includes hostile fire, hardship duty and family separation pay to which he is no longer entitled.

(entire article @ link below)

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/29/opinion/29korb.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. KInda seems like everything related the Army is breaking down...
doesn't it? :shrug: BFEE won't be satisfied until all aspects of the government's operation have been broken. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Odd how smart Clinton was to set the country up like this
Every thing falls apart when Bush comes in. Any on the Right figured out yet that CEO's out of big business may not be abe to run a service which is what gov. is. Bush put his people into every agency so why would any one think they would work well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Does anyone see the irony here
They're hounding soldiers and their families as debtors for a measly few bux (the article says it is 1.5 million) while no one seems the least fucking bit worried about the lost BILLIONS-WITH-A-B in Iraq?

Once again, the little guys takes it up the ass .... after taking it in the chest ... or legs .... or head.

Thank you King George. May I have another?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Whoopsie. Better ratchet up the "Support the troops" squawking
a little louder to cover this up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Fix the system
but 1.5million is so little in the grand scheme of things, let these widows and families mourn in peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Overpayment" ?
Excuse me, but there is NO way that you can "overpay" for a soldier's death or dismemberment.

Everyone else is underpaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Let's collect the overpayments to Halliburton FIRST, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC