Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hagel: ‘Things Are Worse In Middle East Today Than They Were 3 Yrs Ago'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 11:52 AM
Original message
Hagel: ‘Things Are Worse In Middle East Today Than They Were 3 Yrs Ago'
Hagel: ‘Things Are Worse Off In The Middle East Today Than They Were Three Years Ago’


This weekend, President Bush delivered the commencement address at West Point and declared that his global war on terror is helping to spread freedom in the Middle East:

Decades of excusing and accommodating the lack of freedom in the Middle East did nothing to make us safe. So long as the Middle East remains a place where freedom does not flourish, it will remain a place where terrorists foment resentment and threaten American security. So we are pursuing a forward strategy of freedom in the Middle East.


This morning on Meet the Press, Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, delivered a strong rebuke of Bush’s assessment of what’s going on in the Middle East:

I think you could make a pretty strong case that things are worse off in the Middle East today than they were three years ago. By measurement of Iraq, by Iran, by the Palestinian-Israeli issue, what’s going on in Egypt. And, I think the United States must use its force of diplomacy to engage Iran.


Hagel isn’t alone in making his argument that the Middle East is worse off since the Iraq invasion.

more at:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/28/hagel-on-middle-east/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. do I love him....or do I hate him?

Excellent Bush critic

vs


concerns about voting fraud. In the state where where ESS started it all.

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-3.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justice1 Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Look at his voting record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder if Hagel might become the un-Bush for the Republicans.
He could win in Iowa and New Hampshire and become the frontrunner almost overnight.

He doesn't get my vote because he's way too conservative. But he looks halfway decent compared to the rest of the GOP pack of cretins. It's a long, long way between Sam Brownback and Chuck Hagel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. He is OK ...
Being a "conservative" is one thing, and he DEFINITELY is a conservative ... That means he has a strong loyalty to a flawed ideological model ... Not one of us, and not the system that should be in "power" ... BUT, a reasonable balance in our two party system ...

He is not, however, a rabid, drooling neoconservative ... His tone has always been fairly concillitory (sp), not one of these, we have to stay in power at all costs, and we have to put the left down at every possible opportunity that 85% of the repukes have been the last 6 years ...

AND, he isn't an idiot, like most of them, either ... He is smart, and competent ...

IF the republican party were chock full of Hagels, vs Frists, Hasters, Grahams ... this county would be in a LOT better shape right now ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Welcome to DU, Cosmocat. I'm a bit tardy on that welcome, but it's
no less sincere.

Yes. I liked your description of the neo-conservatives, and feel you have accurately represented them.

Iowa is going to be a real interesting caucus this time around -- for both parties, really.

I think Hagel could be holding several high cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hagel is a Republican I can respect if not agree with on every issue. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Hagel is a crook
he owns part of E S & S voting systems, and likely stole his last election campaign.

But the MSM will never explore this. Neither will the Democrats if he is the candiate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hagel is the repug dark horse, imho.
I am to afraid to speak his name out loud. He seems to be reasonable on some issues that would attract moderates. Lets keep his name unknown, shhh.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The freepers call him a RINO. I love it when they eat their own
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Those RINO's could cause us to loose the middle....
They are like wolves in sheep's clothing. He is one repug that really worries me. He can fool allot of people. I fear loosing some of our own to the likes of him if we don't have a really strong candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Things are worse here too, despite the propaganda
What did we get for the hundreds of billions in military spending? Does anyone do cost analysis any more?

Shareholders in many defense contractors made money. This is bush's base. Social needs went unmet. Social injustice and the war on the Constitution and the common people made vast inroads. Medicaid was cut in half in our state. Prison populations continue to expode in the so called "land of the free."

The country is not even close to recovering an area from the devastation of an area the size of Great Britain from last years hurricanes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, he has a knack for stating the obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC