Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whoops - AT&T lets confidential info about NSA lawsuit on to the web...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LiberalPartisan Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 06:42 AM
Original message
Whoops - AT&T lets confidential info about NSA lawsuit on to the web...
http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6077353.html?part=rss&tag=6077353&subj=news


Lawyers for AT&T accidentally released sensitive information while defending a lawsuit that accuses the company of facilitating a government wiretapping program, CNET News.com has learned.
AT&T's attorneys this week filed a 25-page legal brief striped with thick black lines that were intended to obscure portions of three pages and render them unreadable.

But the obscured text nevertheless can be copied and pasted inside some PDF readers, including Preview under Apple Computer's OS X and the xpdf utility used with X11.

The deleted portions of the legal brief seek to offer benign reasons why AT&T would allegedly have a secret room at its downtown San Francisco switching center that would be designed to monitor Internet and telephone traffic. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which filed the class-action lawsuit in January, alleges that the room is used by an unlawful National Security Agency surveillance program.

"AT&T notes that the facts recited by plaintiffs are entirely consistent with any number of legitimate Internet monitoring systems, such as those used to detect viruses and stop hackers," the redacted pages say.

Another section says: "Although the plaintiffs ominously refer to the equipment as the 'Surveillance Configuration,' the same physical equipment could be utilized exclusively for other surveillance in full compliance with" the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

The redacted portions of AT&T's court filing are not classified, and no information relating to actual operations of an NSA surveillance program was disclosed. Also, AT&T's attorneys at the law firms of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman and Sidley Austin were careful not to explicitly acknowledge that such a secret room actually exists.

A representative for AT&T was not immediately available to comment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Welcome to DU "LiberalPartisan" and thank you for a very..............
...interesting article. IMHO, I can't help but think this type of info is "accidentally leaked" on purpose. Maybe it's the only way employees within these companies can fight back against a demanding government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sometimes I wonder about these folks...
Edited on Sat May-27-06 09:06 AM by catabryna
nearly anyone in the legal field would know that a redactor's best friend is a plain ole black Sharpie. Redact, photocopy, scan the photocopy. I can't believe they relied on the software to do that job. :eyes:

But, I certainly appreciate their screw-up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC