CNN: Bush: U.S. does eavesdrop on phone calls of ordinary Americans

[electron_blue]

So which is it? Does he or doesn't he?

Or maybe "eavesdrop" doesn't mean listen in on?

The title is the headline from CNN, link below:

CNN link:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/16/bush.calls.ap/index.html

eta: Never mind, they just corrected their mistake. My screen shot still shows the original "US DOES eavesdrop" headline.

[Dudley_DUright]

1. or maybe the definition of ordinary is

"people we are not eavesdropping in on".

[indie_voter]

2. ROFL!!!!! n/t

[nadinbrzezinski]

3. if them lips are moving

you know he is lying

[Flubadubya]

4. How absolutely Freudian...

Wish someone had the screen shot of that. Hah!!

[bdamomma]

5. to answer your question

YES, Bush is listening, remember he allows no dissent, now they are going after reporters, those same reporters who pledged their loyalty to bushie.