Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colbert and the "Death of Pundit Apartheid"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 05:32 PM
Original message
Colbert and the "Death of Pundit Apartheid"
Ran into this over at In These Times. I love Colbert in the role of the doctor.

The Blustery Screeching Death of Pundit Apartheid
Brian Zick

<snip>

The death knell is sounding, and you can hear it in all the sturm and drang about the “incivility” of bloggers, the whining of Deborah Howell and Jim Brady and John Harris at WaPo, the pathetic attempts to marginalize opinions other than those displayed on the pages or in broadcasts produced by the prominent corporate news operations. Dailykos diarist DaveV has documented a list of petulantista defiance. Dan Froomkin asks the rhetorical question, Why So Defensive?

<snip>

Stephen Colbert was not thought to be funny, by many at the White House Correspondents Dinner, because he basically functioned rather like a doctor notifying his group of patients that their time was nigh. Could be 6 months, could be 6 years. No specific forecasts. But their medical condition plainly indicated that they had better start preparing for their demise. It's understandable that they might not see reason to laugh. Colbert, though, is only one nail in the coffin the establishmentarians see being constructed for their burial.

The dollar cost per word ratio, which once upon a time was the surest indicator of superior media authority, simply doesn't matter any more. At least with respect to opinion mongering, money is no longer power. Now it's Broder and Matthews and Russert and Friedman and Cokie Roberts, et al, competing with Atrios and Kos and Digby and Billmon and Josh Marshall. In the marketplace of ideas, power accrues to those with a larger capacity for brain function. Who has the bigger audience right now? Who will have the bigger audience in the next two years, the next four years? Will Washington Week invite Bill Scher and Steve Soto and Christy Hardin Smith to sit on the panel? Will Washington Week have any relevance at all? Will the Lehrer News Hour update its fossilized Shields and Brooks editorial combat to feature the Rude Pundit versus Michelle Malkin?

However it ultimately shakes out, the vampires have seen the glow of the approaching morn. The spoiled children have recognized they'll no longer be the center of attention. The dinosaurs are stuck in the tar, agonized by the portents of evolution. The supremacists have been shaken by the conquering arrival of equality. You can see it, and hear it, happening. Not as fast as you might like, and not all at once. But it's happening. You can tell by the churlish tone of the whine.


more at link:

http://www.theittlist.com/site/ittlist/ind/the_blustery_screeching_death_of_pundit_apartheid/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lovely read
The end is nigh for the popinjays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is really good....
and I sure hope he's right.

I like the point he makes that bloggers are winning their audience because they have actual ideas and talk about real stuff instead of spin spin spin.

This quote is good too:

People losing authority feel dispossessed, angry at the decline - and foreseeable loss altogether - of their power. So they gripe. As loud as they can.

That could describe any formerly dominant group who are losing their dominant status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nice Piece
thanks for this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. good insights
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just sent this piece to Dick Boy himself.
Heh heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The Courier-Journal in Louisville has a take on last week, too.
Maybe the tide has finally turned and the journalists are no longer able to hide behind Chucklenuts' lies and expect an invite to the White House. Here is another take on this week with Chimpy.

Comedy comes to the rescue
And a Full Monty for the First Amendment


By Pam Platt

(snip)

That, in a context of emperors and no clothes, it was even a full-Monty workout of the First Amendment via sight, sound and satire.

OK. But what does all that mean?

The best I could come up with was a Buffalo Springfield line from the last time pop culture was a major player in the social and political landscape: "There's something happening here / What it is ain't exactly clear . . . " -- which was nice to remember but did little for the clarity department.

So I called Robert Thompson, professor of television and popular culture at Syracuse University, whom I believed could explain the significance of that trifecta, if there was any. And he did.

Headline to our discussion: What Thompson calls The Fifth Estate -- comedy -- has rushed in to fill the void left where The Fourth Estate -- the press -- has feared or failed to tread … which is on the toes or the sensibilities of the powerful. (emphasis mine)

Bottom line to that discussion: Something is happening here, Thompson said, all over the place. And pop culture is something of a windsock -- my image, not his -- catching snatches or gusts of change that also show up in poll numbers and disapproval ratings.

Platt does a fine job of tying in "United 93," Bruce Springsteen's performance in New Orleans and Steven Colbert's performance at the WHC dinner into one big ball of the people the failures of this White House and the "journalists."

Love the professor's reference to the "fifth estate" - comedy doing the MSM's job.

You can read the entire article here - http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060507/COLUMNISTS10/605070364/1054/OPINION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. A Full Monty workout of the First Amendment
Ha! That's perfect. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. How to protect the internet as the "Public Square"?
It is our ability to communicate with each other directly that has made the internet the big spoiler in the fascist party balls that this crowd has been planning for since their betrayal by FDR.

If we EVER get the power back, even for a brief shining moment, the access to the internet MUST be clearly included into the "Right of Assembly" in the Bill of Rights.

Without our current ability to bypass the corporate media, we would have already passed the point of no return (and we are damn close even with our eyes open).

This is a most precious resource and it deserves whatever protections we can institutionalize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. K & R. Honored to be the 5th. Excellent read. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. My observations exactly - only better writing.
That's what their whining meant. We finally have a voice and they don't like it none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quetzalro Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Great piece!
Thanks very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC