|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
serryjw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:28 PM Original message |
Any DU lawyers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. I should hope so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm not a lawyer, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes it can be used as evidence in a trial because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spindrifter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 05:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. Agreed--what's more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Synnical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. Here's the story . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
serryjw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 05:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Thanks, I had no luck in finding it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 05:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. this is a bit complicated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrcheerful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yes its legal. The tapes were turned into the police, as long as police |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Master Mahon (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
6. Since the tapes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I thought the guy himself was seen on the tapes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Master Mahon (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:39 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Maybe OJ's attorneys? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radwriter0555 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Simpson's attorney is dead. However maybe marcia "oj is innocent" clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 05:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Marcia Clark was the prosecutor, not the Defense Lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radwriter0555 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 11:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. You're right! And she's the reason simpson is walking free today. In her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. That's the right answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 05:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. A thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 05:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Yeah, maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. In this case, the guy is ON the tapes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. I was going to ask whether he was in the videos, but then saw the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. There was no article when I formulated my response! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
8. eliminated upon enlightenment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CPMaz (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-04-06 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
14. Hope so, since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC