Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UNITED 93 Question

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:13 PM
Original message
UNITED 93 Question
This is something that has been bugging me for years - from when I first heard the story and now re-ignited by the recent movie.

OK...so according to the story, Todd Bingham called his mom from his cell phone from thousands of feet in the air. Now have you ever tried to use your cell on a plane in the air?

I did (yes, bad Taverner, bad bad, never do that, etc...) and it WILL NOT work until you are near the transponders, e.g. no more than say a couple hundred feet of the ground. I put this to the test on my last business trip and found that I did not get reception until the plane was landing.

So how in the name of fuck did Todd Bingham call his mom? How? The only way would be to use one of those sattelite phones...

Also, there were supposed to be a number of victims on one of the other flights that crashed into the WTC who called their loved ones from phones. This I can *kind* of beleive as NYC has transponders on top of the skyscrapers and it would be a lot easier to place the call. HOWEVER, the plane still would have had to have been flying really low for calls to be made. Doing so does not make sense as the plane encounters much more air resistance and the hijackers wouldn't have been able to control the planes as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. there was a guy who flew around with a cell phone after 9/11...
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 04:22 PM by mike_c
...to test precisely that and he proved pretty conclusively that it was not possible to use a cell phone reliably from cruising altitude-- I'll look for the info....

on edit: I found this: http://www.physics911.net/cellphoneflight93.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. EXACTLY!
I've done this test myself a few times too...and the bars don't go up until you have almost landed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Do we know what altitude the plane was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Probably not, but Todd Bingham allegedly called his mom
soon after the plane was hijacked...so it's more than likely they were above cruising altitute.

And FTR, even when below cruising altitude, I have never been able to use my cell phone. And it's a pretty good phone...Cingular network too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
35. They were in PA and they were supposed
to be going to the White House so I would think they were at cruising altitude....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shilohtd16 Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. i have made calls from a plane
as long as you are below cruising altitude it usually works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Isn't that forbidden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Um...yes
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shilohtd16 Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. ...yes
but it was for good reasons (college apps etc)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
36. The law is the law. Too bad the President doesn't know that.
Of course, he eavesdrops illegally for "good reasons" but that is not right either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Hello.
Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. From your cell phone? What cruising altitute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shilohtd16 Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. it was on a corprate jet
and it was flying at 25,000 i think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. They had to have a system on the plane that would allow you to
use your cell phone. They're starting to put them on commercial flights now. No way your cell phone can work at 25,000 ft without a lot of help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are a lot of questions.
Have you ever been to the 9/11 forum of DU? Suffice it to say, not everyone believes the *official* story. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes I've read many of the questions
Some are very valid (why did WTC 7 collapse? Why didn't fighter jets scramble to intercept the other planes? Why were the FBI able to identify all of the hijackers within hours of the attack, yet were powerless to prevent it?)

and some are ludicrous (Did a rocket bomb the pentagon?)

My guess is that for every valid question, there has been a certain amount of *noise* put out to discredit them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slybacon9 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. For the information on the chances of this actually working...
you need to watch Loose Change...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change

the cell phone calling will be the least of your questions after that.

i fly a lot... have a great phone (5 years later, better reception and better coverage) and i've tried every time... to no avail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I would love to see that movie
I've heard great things about it - but its one of those I've never been able to download
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slybacon9 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. how come?
it's right there on google for all to watch, no?

the link i sent above, no workie for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That link worked - THANKS!
I had tried to bittorrent it and couldn't earlier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. People who ask too many questions are anti-American and love...
terrorists. Why don't you go back to your queer hippie commune and burn flags there?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. In that movie that was on A&E--
I believe that some of the passengers were using phones near their seats, that the plane was already equipped with. Not cell phones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Bingo! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Airphones
And yes - this I could believe. But the news reports then (and at the time) specifically said cell phones. And apparently in the movie Todd Bingham uses a cell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Airphones--
Didn't know the proper name. Makes sense. Yes, all reports talk about is cell phone, which is way I found it strange that they were using airphones in that movie. I can't remember if they showed Bingham on his cell or not. I think they did.

We will never know what happened. Maybe the family wants to for a kind of closure. I hope the passangers did fight back. At least they went out with a fight. But we will never know.


If they want to make a movie about it, that's fine. They make movies about everything nowadays. Doesn't surprise me that they're making a movie(s) about 9/11.
But in situations like this one, we will never know. Facts are not always going to be accurate in any case. I guess we can only believe what we want to believe because none of us really know what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. I thought only one person talked to someone they knew. Most people
then talked to strangers, which I thought was a little wierd. Yes, you're right about the cell phones. I also heard there were no phone charges from the plane phone on people's credit cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. According to Ted Olson (we know how much we can trust him)
His wife Barbara called him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yes, my thought exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Barbara Olson wasn't on Flight 93
She was on the Pentagon plane, and I am not sure she called from the air (according to TO). The DC plane may not have reached altitude to be out of range for cell phoning.

Also, some people used "plane phones" - not sure if in flight phones are cellular or satelite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. cell phones only work if you call strangers, see?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. My thoughts on this...
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 05:26 PM by Behind the Aegis
We don't know what kind of phone Mark had. Perhaps it was a satellite phone, perhaps it was an airfone, perhaps it was in the last few minutes (meaning the plane was low enough to get a signal). What sticks in my mind is what possible reason would his mother have to lie about the call?

Two years ago, my mother got a call from one of my brothers. He was flying to Turkey for a military meeting. He called my mother from the plane. Of course, unbeknownst to my mother at the time, my brother's plane was about to crash, so he called to say good-bye to my mom (without letting her know what was happening until a day later). Thankfully, the pilot was able to make an emergency landing and no-one was seriously injured. I can tell you that my mother didn't lie about that call!

I doubt we will ever know what really happened that day, but as far as I am concerned, Ms. Bingham got that call from her son and in the grand scheme of things, is it really all that important if she didn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Well she shouldn't lie
about getting the call or not.

You say this

"What sticks in my mind is what possible reason would his mother have to lie about the call?"

but then this

"Ms. Bingham got that call from her son and in the grand scheme of things, is it really all that important if she didn't?"


It is important if she got the call or not.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. So are you inferring she has lied?
You say "It is important if she got the call or not." and I still assert, "...in the grand scheme of things, is it really all that important if she didn't?"

I don't understand the point of the selective quoting you did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I don't think she lied.
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 05:16 PM by bigwillq
I hope no mother would. I will never know the real truth about what happened on that flight or in the aftermath.


My point to you is---

you say what reason is there for the mother to lie.
But then say in the grand scheme of things is it really all that important if she didn't (get the call)?


It is important if she got the call or not. If she didn't get the call and she is lying about it, then that is a very important fact to know.
If she really did get the call, that's a very important fact to know.


In the grand scheme of things--it is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. My mother would lie about something like that.
She has always told "fibs" all the way up to outright lies to inflate her involvement in any given family crisis. Yes, unfortunately, there are people out there like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Because the mother was in on it.......
What was your mother doing the night before 9/11....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. it is MARK Bingham, not Todd!
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 05:38 PM by Behind the Aegis
You have mixed names. Todd (Beamer) is of "Let's Roll" fame and called his wife and I believe a local 411. Mark Bingham was the gay rugby player.

Edited to add this link: http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/chart.html#Mark_Bingham

I don't know anything about that site, but I thought it may shed some light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. You miss one big thing
Verifying this is very, very easy.

If Todd made the call there would be a cell phone record. If he didn't, there wouldn't be. Given the amount of time this idea has been kicked around (just check out the 9/11 forum) I would be shocked to find out nobody had ever asked for proof. Just to be clear, I don't know either way. I'm just saying this shouldn't be any great mystery. Either there is a cell phone record of the call or there isn't.

BTW, I work for a Telecom company and the number of people that would know if a fake record were added to the database is large enough to invoke the "conspiracies involving large numbers of people are usually groundless" principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Just watched "Loose Change" and
There were NO cell phone records of ANY of the cell phone or airphone calls made.

None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Loose Change is Wrong
I did some research on this. There were over 30 calls made by passengers on that flight, and there ARE tapes of 911 calls that were made. Simply put, that is way too large a number of calls and recordings of conversations to fake, making the number of people that would have to be involved in the conspiracy ridiculously large.

http://cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&day_of_9/11=ua93
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Understood - but tell me then
How can I make a cell phone call from a plane? Not counting the airphone...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Might not have been a cell phone
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 03:43 PM by Nederland
Several of the people that called friends/family said that they were on the airplane phones that are on the backs of airplane seats, Mark might have been one of them.

<snip>

From Flight 93, Mark Bingham calls his mother and says, “I’m on a flight from Newark to San Francisco and there are three guys who have taken over the plane and they say they have a bomb.” In an alternate version, he says, “I’m in the air, I’m calling you on the Airfone. I’m calling you from the plane. We’ve been taken over. There are three men that say they have a bomb.”

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
42. Does anyone remember reports from the ground
that the callers from the hijacked planes didn't sound like themselves? In other words, they sounded "robotic"?
I read that online within 2-3 days after, and then the story disappeared. Before you start shouting "Tinfoil hat!" there were no 9-11 sites up that early. It was all news and online journals.
As far as this movie is concerned, sinice there were no survivors, it is full of poetic license. I don't need to see it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. That's the way you should on a satellite phone, FWIW. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
45. Does anyone remember the quote, "Mom, this is Todd Bingham".
What's wrong with this "quote"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC