cross post: 19th century photography poll.

Deep13

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-27-06 03:01 PM
Original message

cross post: 19th century photography poll.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=105&topic_id=5989195&mesg_id=5989195

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Blue_In_AK

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-27-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message

1. Gotta go with the slow shutter speed. :-)

Edited on Wed Dec-27-06 03:24 PM by Blue_In_AK

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

priller

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-27-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message

2. Ha ha! I liked your response, Deep13:

"The high from photo chemicals not as good as opium."

But seriously, the biggest problem had to have been the sheer size of the equipment needed. Huge camera, large glass plate negatives, tubs of chemicals, all in a covered wagon. And I complain about how heavy my backback is with all my lenses in it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.