I wrote this last year when the Boston Globe had a hissy fit over whether or not John Kerry had picked up back-sliding notions about marriage equality in heathen places, like Pennsylvania and Louisiana. (PA only because he had, at one time, co-sponsored a religious liberty bill with Evil Ricky that could, if you looked at it myopically and without due regard for what it actually said, be construed as, heavens, not very liberal. Honestly John, must you talk to these people? Isn't that Romney's job? Sigh!)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=273&topic_id=26578&mesg_id=26590Not much has changed.
Herewith a guide to the massively disgruntled in Massachusetts.
LiberalLand gets no respect and immediately distrusts anyone who gets elected because that is damn near proof enough that they have sold out. If they haven't sold out, then how did they get elected? Riddle me this Batman, how can any self-respecting liberal want to work from within the system, especially if that system is full of other elected politicians from places that are not really very liberal? (Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Welcome to my world.) LiberalLand is about 20% or so of Massachusetts. They have actually affected great change over the years in the Commonwealth and are responsible for a lot of the great moments in State history and are definitely responsible for Massachusetts having a national reputation as a 'pain in the arse' state. I deeply love LiberalLand, at the same time that I get deeply frustrated with LiberalLand.
Sen. Kerry lives, at least part of the time, in LiberalLand. However, as he is a successful politician who has been in power for decades, he is not to be trusted, unless there is no alternative. (In which case, we support him, but demand that the reservations go in the official record so that if anything goes wrong we can say, I told you so.) Kerry has championed gay rights, civil rights, the environment, clean elections, good judicial appointments, and a severe view of when the military should be used in war over his long career. While most states would say that is a pretty good progressive record, he has failed to achieve liberal perfection and therefore must have sold out somewhere along the line even if we can't quite put our finger on when it was. (After Iran-Contra, but before the welfare vote. Somewhere in 1994-5, right around the time he got married. OMG, you don't think.... nah, maybe, gee, he mellowed?????)
The grass is always greener over the neighbors lawn. There is always a better liberal, a progressive Messiah over the next horizon. Once we find this person, we will use them to seize power and implement Utopia forthwith. In which case, we will immediately be the first to announce that we are not to be trusted because we will be the powerful and will shortly there after implode.
Such is LiberalLand in the great Commonwealth of MAssachusetts.
The Massachusetts State Motto is "Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" which is Latin for: "By the sword we seek peace, but peace only under liberty." Yeah, it's like that. (I love that motto, but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense unless you live here.)