Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any bets on whether CSPAN will air THIS SFRC hearing?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
Luftmensch067 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:39 PM
Original message
Any bets on whether CSPAN will air THIS SFRC hearing?
Check out the witnesses!

US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
BUILDING ON SUCCESS:
NEW DIRECTIONS IN GLOBAL HEALTH

Presiding:
Senator Kerry

Date:
Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Time:
9:30 A.M.

Building:
216 Hart Senate Office Building

Witnesses

The Honorable William Jefferson Clinton
Chairman
William J. Clinton Foundation
New York, NY

Bill Gates
Co-Chair
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Seattle, WA


Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow - they really might with those witnesses
It will be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Actually
and according to the current CSPAN schedule, they won't! Not live at least. Will be covered online though, or so they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Luftmensch067 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks for checking this!
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 09:28 AM by Luftmensch067
Still looks like they won't do it live (which is not unusual) but maybe if they're filming it and covering it online, they will eventually air it on TV as well. Hope so!

Edited to add: Here's link to live online stream http://c-span.org/Watch/Media/2010/03/10/HP/R/30493/Bill+Clinton+Bill+Gates+discuss+global+health.aspx

They're already streaming even though neither Committee nor witnesses there yet. And it's the top item on the CSPAN homepage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Luftmensch067 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. JK is so great as SFRC Chairman
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 11:37 AM by Luftmensch067
I've only been following this committee regularly since 2005, so my perspective is limited, but I've never seen hearings run so efficiently or with so much courtesy and lack of histrionics (to this point, is it my imagination, or are the GOP members often staying away in droves, except when they intend to grandstand, viz. Inhofe on climate change? I don't include Lugar, who is clearly of a different stamp of GOP)

The hearings are consistently professional, effective in information-gathering and clarification, and kind of...friendly! I really miss the roundtables JK initiated and wish there could be more of those, but the official hearings are exemplary.

Edited to correct my misconception: On the minority side, I regularly see participation by Corker, for sure, and Barrasso just asked a question. I guess I just didn't recognize them as GOP because they weren't grandstanding. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Can't watch, but I can comment :-)
I've seen Corker in committees, and found him surprisingly good. Agree or not with what he says, but he seems serious, reasonably knowledgeable, and not in the grand standing category. IMHO he is definitely in the tiny (and shrinking) group of "Rs one can work with". I wish I did not have this gut almost alergic reaction (not to mention complete ignorance) against anything having to do with financial issues, so I could make some sense out of what he is trying to do with Dodd in the Banking committeee.

How is CLinton doing? Gates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Like you, my viewing is mostly after 2005
So, it really comes down to only three chairs. Of the three, the easiest choice is who was the worst in terms of running the committee - and that was Biden. Of the three, he was the courteous to the other members, though part of that was that he wanted to mimize the time Kerry and Obama got - possibly because he wanted to use the Iraq hearings to make a name for himself in 2007 because he was running. In addition he seemed to give himself time after each Senator questioned the panels to make his own summary.

Both Kerry and Lugar were polite to everyone. I remember Lugar often giving Kerry additional time because he thought the questioning was productive. Both of them held hearings on a broad range of topics, but the edge there goes to Kerry, who seems not just to have had intensive hearings on particular countries or events, but many on broader concerns and reviewing fundamental issues of how American diplomacy should be done. I think that Kerry is very lucky to have Lugar as the ranking member and it is clear that they are working very hard and very well together on many of these things. I think Kerry is the one with more energy and more vision, but Lugar's long history and the fact that his being involved gets enough Republican support, almost always including Corker, to pass things is very important. (It is interesting to see what looks like respect and even friendliness towards Kerry from Corker.)

Kerry has a great record getting all the SFRC bills passed and defeating the many Republican resolutions designed to throw monkey wrenches into the administration's diplomacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Luftmensch067 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't know much about Lugar apart from SFRC
But he and JK seem to be cut from the same cloth when it comes to old-fashioned courtesy. It's a pleasure to see them work so well and effectively together! I imagine Lugar doesn't care for the rudeness of many of those in the current GOP much either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow, I'll have to check this out. Here is Kerry's opening statement:

Chairman Kerry Opening Statement At Hearing On Global Health

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-MA) today chaired a hearing exploring the challenges and opportunities in global health.

Full text of Chairman Kerry’s opening statement as prepared is below:

Today we are very pleased to welcome two of our nation’s most important leaders on global health—one a former President of the United States, and the other the CEO and Chairman of one of America’s most transformative companies.

Long after their own places in history were secure, both Bill Clinton and Bill Gates made it their passion to write an impressive new chapter in the effort to solve some of the world’s most pressing problems.

Fighting HIV/AIDS has long been at the top of that list. And during a polarizing era in America’s politics, it has been the kind of bipartisan success story that defines our democracy at its best. Back in 1999 and 2000, I was pleased to work with Jesse Helms, Bill Frist, and many partners from both sides of the aisle to pass comprehensive HIV/AIDS legislation that laid the foundation for PEPFAR.

Today, thanks to these programs, over 2.4 million people are receiving life-saving treatment and nearly 350,000 babies of HIV-positive mothers have been born HIV-free. That’s not enough—but it does represent a remarkable achievement.

What’s more, we have made great strides against malaria. This, in turn, has cut childhood mortality in some areas by as much as one third. And the Global Fund, where every American dollar is matched twice over, has helped to prevent millions of deaths across 140 countries.

But as long as so many lives remain at risk, we cannot rest on past accomplishments. As the Administration finalizes its new Global Health Initiative, we must ask ourselves: Where should we go from here? How can we build on success?

The Global Health Initiative has rightly identified several core principles that should guide our thinking:

First, health systems are more than the sum of their parts. Even as we expand our fight against HIV/AIDS, we have to look beyond the vertical silo of any single disease.

Second, a holistic approach leads us to focus on the women and girls who are at the center of each family’s health, but are too often marginalized by their economies and health systems. This includes taking on maternal mortality, which robs families of half a million young mothers every year.

And third, because we seek to empower other countries to eventually assume full responsibility for the care of their own citizens, we must recognize their priorities and the importance of building local capacity.

These principles informed the strong bipartisan message of the Lantos-Hyde PEPFAR Reauthorization bill of 2008. And I hope they will provide the underpinnings for strong bipartisan support going forward for advancing global health and strengthening the fight against HIV/AIDS.

My wife Teresa and I saw firsthand the most courageous and frustrating realities of this struggle when we visited the Umgeni Primary School near Durban, South Africa in late 2007. We saw caregivers who devote their lives to helping the region’s AIDS orphans; children left with no choice but to assume adult responsibilities at a tender age; and single mothers scratching out subsistence in mud houses, their husbands lost to a horrific disease. We saw the crushing economic impact of poor health—which underscores why improving health lays the foundation for better economic development across the board.

Clearly, our fight against HIV/AIDS is far from over. But we also have new challenges. Already, as our climate changes and mosquitoes expand their range, malaria is surging in areas that have hardly ever seen it before, like the Kenyan Highlands. We must ask ourselves: are we doing enough to prepare for the health challenges that climate change may bring on a massive scale?

And we in Congress must answer another crucial question: is this an investment we can afford? In an interconnected world where drug-resistant tuberculosis could be on the next plane landing at Dulles, the answer—emphatically—is that we can’t afford not to invest in these programs. A strong global public health system is not merely a favor we do for other countries. It is the right thing to do morally and strategically, and it protects our own citizens.

In fact, such a remarkably effective bipartisan effort is precisely the kind of program that is worth defending in a budgetary environment where there is pressure to simply slash our investments in the world.

To make each tax dollar go further, we must also leverage our government’s contribution into greater cooperation from the private sector. And it is no exaggeration to say that the Clinton and Gates Foundations have revolutionized the public-private partnership. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has invested billions of dollars in support of HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention, vaccines, and a host of other health challenges. The Clinton Foundation has done groundbreaking work negotiating down drug prices globally for life-saving medications—and pioneered projects that transcend the artificial boundaries between health and development.

Our guests today, Bill Clinton and Bill Gates, need no further introduction. I look forward to a lively discussion with two of the great innovative thinkers in America today, and I thank them for coming to brief the Committee. Senator Lugar.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Nice statement
This might be the understatement of the day - "Our guests today, Bill Clinton and Bill Gates, need no further introduction."

Going to watch it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Luftmensch067 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Online TV schedule listing this at 9:33 pm EST
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 07:46 PM by Luftmensch067
But only for half an hour? But they have it listed under their "Prime Repeat" category and there's lots of mystery about the nature of the other programs with that tag, so maybe this will be the whole hearing after all. C-SPAN is very strange...

Edited to add that this is C-SPAN 3, at the moment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Luftmensch067 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Sorry for another comment, too late for me to edit to add info
What is UP with C-SPAN?! Hasn't their chief virtue been that they aired the COMPLETE version of news events? Uncut and commercial-free, as TCM would have it?

Apparently their new "C3 PRIME REPEAT" gimmick is to pluck 30 minutes of whichever bit they liked best of an event and make you watch the rest online. Just before they aired the SFRC meeting, they aired some of a Senate Homeland Security Committee meeting and stopped it in mid-sentence. Then they started the SFRC broadcast with Clinton's opening statement, completely excising JK's opening statement. I don't know if they plan to air the whole event at a later time because they refuse to identify what the later C3 PRIME REPEAT broadcasts consist of. Maybe this is a move to transfer their operation completely online eventually? Whatever it is, I don't think it's a good idea. The TV broadcast has better video quality and is available to more households, and I keep reminding myself that, whatever they appear to believe, C-SPAN is supposed to be working in the public interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. CNN .com coverage - pretty decent
The only quibble I have is that they refer to "George Bush's emergency plan for AIDS", while Kerry referred to it as a bipartisan Senate response - starting with himself and Frist and then the bipartisan SFRC effort. This though is typical as credit does often go to the President who signed it into law. After speaking of the need for this to be bipartisan, Kerry said:



Kerry also said the Obama administration's proposed global health initiative has identified principles that should guide U.S. thinking on the matter: Looking beyond the "vertical silo" of any one disease; focusing on women and girls, who are at the "center of each family's health"; and empowering other countries to eventually assume full responsibility for their citizens' care. Kerry said the administration is "finalizing" the initiative.

"A strong global public health system is not merely a favor we do for other countries," Kerry said. "It is the right thing to do morally and strategically, and it protects our own citizens."


Bill Clinton said:

"We live in an interdependent world in which we have learned the hard way that no matter how brilliantly our forces perform, we can not kill, jail or occupy all of our adversaries," he told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in discussing why the issue of global health should be important to the United States.


Gates said he hoped that Congress will be able to increase the funding for vaccine allocation and for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, a financial organization that organizes and distributes resources to fight the diseases.


http://edition.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/10/global.health/
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I posted the CNN article with the SFRC info on GD-P
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC