Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blue Grass Army Depot: STATE CHARGES ARMY CHEMICAL WEAPONS DEPOT WITH VIOLATIONS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 08:17 AM
Original message
Blue Grass Army Depot: STATE CHARGES ARMY CHEMICAL WEAPONS DEPOT WITH VIOLATIONS
http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=942


STATE CHARGES ARMY CHEMICAL WEAPONS DEPOT WITH VIOLATIONS — Criminal Probe Widens to Spill Cover-Ups and Falsification of Monitoring Reports

Washington, DC — The Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has cited a U.S. Army chemical weapons facility for improper storage, testing and training, according to a state inspection report released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). In addition, the state has referred evidence of activities “considered of a potentially criminal nature” to the criminal investigations arm of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, as well as the state inspector general.

The October 31, 2007 Site Inspection Report details notices of violations issued against the Blue Grass Army Depot, located outside of Richmond, 30 miles south of Lexington. Blue Grass stores more than 500 tons of chemical warfare agents, including highly lethal nerve gas, inside storage units called igloos. The report reviews 40 disclosures made by base personnel. Violations verified by Kentucky DEP include –

* Not testing spills from rockets containing agent that are stored inside the igloos;
* Improper storage practices which crush the shells of rockets and cause leaks; and
* “ailing to ensure employees are properly trained to prevent release of chemical warfare agents.”

Blue Grass is already the subject of a federal criminal grand jury probe as well as whistleblower complaints that have been lodged by chemists, security agents and technicians. The Kentucky DEP has added to the scope of those other investigations by referring evidence it found that –

* Blue Grass staff may have been exposed to nerve agent but never notified or monitored;
* Managers “scrub” or falsify monitoring reports, and in some instances turn off monitoring equipment to mask problems; and
* The base routinely transfers or blackballs whistleblowers.

“This report appears to vindicate the whistleblowers even while leaving many very troubling questions unresolved,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, whose organization is representing depot whistleblowers. “People who report problems do not stay long at Blue Grass.”

Perhaps even more disturbing were some of the issues that were beyond the scope of Kentucky DEP’s review and thus left unaddressed, including –

* The absence of procedures to tell whether chemical agents are in the waste water that is flushed from the igloos; and
* The air monitors inside the igloos were configured so as to be ineffective, an issue first raised by Donald Van Winkle more than two years ago. Van Winkle was then stripped of his clearance to work in the igloo farm.

“There is so much smoke rising from Blue Grass that it either means a big fire or one severe case of smoke inhalation,” Ruch added. “Congress needs to step in and look at whether these chemical weapon depots are being managed competently.”


View the Notices of Violation issued to Blue Grass Chemical Weapon Depot

Read the Kentucky DEP Site Inspection Report

Revisit the ongoing federal grand jury probe at Blue Grass

Look at the problems uncovered by Donald Van Winkle

See other concerns raised by whistleblowers



http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=942
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC