Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DoD Buzz: Surge Hawks’ Frustration Mounts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 07:24 AM
Original message
DoD Buzz: Surge Hawks’ Frustration Mounts



Surge Hawks’ Frustration Mounts
By Greg Grant Thursday, November 5th, 2009 4:39 pm
Posted in International, Land, Policy

It was a sullen and disgruntled panel that talked Afghanistan at the American Enterprise Institute last night. The conservative think tank has nowhere near the same influence with the Obama crowd as they did when Bush was in office and their calls for a massive Afghan “surge” have, so far, appeared to fall on deaf ears.

AEI’s Fred Kagan said emphatically that we are losing the war in Afghanistan. The Taliban are sweeping across the country. Any delay in a troop surge means we will lose much faster. Fellow hawk Tom Donnelly said an additional 40,000 troops, the figure that is routinely bandied about as the number of troops ISAF commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal wants, is no longer sufficient to stave off defeat. He called for a surge of eight to 10 brigades to Afghanistan, which gets close to 60,000 troops.

Providing a more measured analysis was Council on Foreign Relations’ fellow Stephen Biddle. He supports McChrystal’s “integrated-counterinsurgency” strategy as the best hope to prevent Afghanistan descending once again into a “grand mal” civil war. Biddle emphasized that McChrystal’s prescription is a “high-cost” way to go; problem is there aren’t many other options with much chance of success.


McChrystal’s report made clear that the situation in Afghanistan is “serious” and that “many indicators suggest the overall situation is deteriorating.” A couple of important points should be kept in mind. McChrystal’s review was conducted in the spring and early summer. At that time, there were 36,000 American troops in Afghanistan. By the end of the year the number will be 68,000.

In 2006, the year things truly began to go south in Afghanistan and the insurgency made substantial inroads, there were just 20,000 American and 12,000 foreign troops there. That number increased to just 30,000 during 2008. American troop numbers have doubled in just the past 8 months. Those additional troops, along with more helicopters and more reconnaissance assets, have barely had time to make their presence felt, but it will not be immediate.


Rest of article at: http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/11/05/surge-hawks-frustration-mounts/?wh=wh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC