Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Failure Not An Option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:50 AM
Original message
Failure Not An Option
Failure Not An Option
March 12, 2009
Marine Corps News

MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, Va. — Our Corps’ position remains unequivocal — the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle is essential to what we do and is our top acquisition priority. It is a mistake to let past technical difficulties shape the future of the program.

Operational experience has repeatedly demonstrated that the rapid projection of Marine Corps combat power ashore is the key to success in all amphibious missions across the range of military operations. The tremendous flexibility and utility, both across the littorals and deep inland, make it a significant addition to joint commanders’ employment options. Even if the landing force could avoid fixed defenses, comparative analysis has shown that shuttling personnel carriers on landing craft air-cushioned would delay the build up of combat power ashore to the extent that the landing force would incur significant casualties from an enemy counter-attack.

Additionally, anti-ship cruise missiles are lethal ship-killers, as demonstrated when Hezbollah struck an Israeli warship during the Lebanon crisis in 2006, but neutralizing these weapons is facilitated by keeping ships over the horizon. The Navy and Marine Corps have therefore pursued a complementary mix of over-the-horizon capabilities, to include rotary-wing and tilt-rotor aircraft, LCACs, and the EFV.

A surface amphibious fighting vehicle that self-deploys from a ship at high speed provides the joint commander the ability to quickly mass combat power ashore while overcoming projected anti-access threats. The Joint Requirements Oversight Council validated the requirement for the EFV, which is to provide rapid combat power build-up ashore from over the horizon.

It’s important to understand that when DoD programs exceed planned cost and schedule, Congress requires the secretary of Defense to make certain certifications. The EFV underwent a complete review in spring 2007, and the Office of the Secretary of Defense certified, among other things, that “the EFV program is essential to national security and there are no alternatives which will provide equal or greater military capability at a reduced cost.”


Rest of article at: http://www.military.com/news/article/marine-corps-news/failure-not-an-option.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC