Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Op-Ed) Putting an End to the 'Fool's Errand'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 07:52 AM
Original message
(Op-Ed) Putting an End to the 'Fool's Errand'
Putting an End to the 'Fool's Errand'
James Callard | August 28, 2008

"The biggest stupid idea was to invade Iraq in the first place…. ------- stupid."
-- Lt Col David Kilcullen, Senior military adviser to Condoleezza Rice

"Barack Obama is refreshingly intelligent after having the village idiot in the White House."
-- Retired Air Force General Tony McPeak


The above quotes show serious frustration from military strategists over Bush's national security strategy. Unfortunately the media and pundits continue to focus on the wrong stuff -- like the surge. It was a tactic in an overall flawed strategy. We don't focus on the long view. We don't look past the tips of our skis.

Vietnam vet and Republican senator Chuck Hagel gets it: "Quit talking about, 'Did the surge work or not work.' We're done with that." "What are we going to do for the next four years to protect the interest of America and our allies and restructure a new order in the world?" Can we achieve our national security interests without discarding our values? How will we pay for the strategy?

General McPeak knows that the American taxpayer paid a total of $4.7 billion for the first Persian Gulf War -- less than half of one month's cost of the current war in Iraq. McPeak is part of a small group of officers that felt we should continue to apply the lessons of Desert Storm and the Balkan Wars; that we can project power and influence with more credibility and less risk; and that sacrifice should be a means and not a desired end.

Why have we rejected the lessons of Desert Storm and the war in the Balkans?

There are multiple reasons, and the real story is about the debate that has been going on for the last 18 years, between those advocating real transformation of national security strategy and those that wanted to return to an attrition type warfare that is expensive, unsustainable, manpower intensive, involves heavy casualties, and requires long term occupation of foreign lands.


Rest of article at: http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,174606,00.html?wh=news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. beautiful post--- thank you!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC