Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge rules against Louisiana video game law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Recreation & Sports » Gaming Group Donate to DU
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:32 PM
Original message
Judge rules against Louisiana video game law
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060825-7597.html

Judge Brady was especially critical of the evidence included as part of the legislative record that purported to show a clear link between video game and real-world violence. In his ruling, he said that "The evidence that was submitted to the legislature in connection with the bill that became the statute is sparse and could hardly be called in any sense reliable." He also noted that the studies cited in the law have "been considered by numerous courts and in each case the connection was found to be tenuous and speculative."

In a brief interview, Thompson told Ars that he laid the blame for the judge's decision at the feet of the Louisiana Attorney General's office, saying that they "were at best incompetent and at worst compromised." He believes a decision was made not to put up a real defense of the bill, possibly due to pressure from the ESA. "I told the state that they were going down in flames two months ago," said Thompson, "and they didn't give a flip."


Chalk up another one for the good guys. There needs to be a law about passing blatantly unconstitutional, politically motivated, legislation. They wasted taxpayer resources on this and need to be held accountable.

Jay
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. They referred to Jack Thompson as a "Video Game Crusader"
Edited on Sun Aug-27-06 11:21 AM by YOY
Calling that fundie fuck anything along the lines of a 'crusader' only strengthens his shitty arguments. He wastes everyone's time and money by presenting his pseudo scientific evidence that has about as much merit as a Jack Chick tract.

This is the asshole who claimed it was a video gamer who committed the beltway sniping spree before that nut-case John Mohamed and his kid were found to be the culprits. He has been on the forefront of using this brand stupidity, ignorance, and sensationalism to push his little right-wing agenda of constitutional rape and pseudo-christian morals.

Call him what he is: a born again asshole who used poor/non-evidence to enforce his disturbed little set of moral values upon the rest of the world. I am sickened that we share a hometown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Recreation & Sports » Gaming Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC