Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone have any good scientific links on issues related to Rossi's supposed fusion device?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:09 AM
Original message
Does anyone have any good scientific links on issues related to Rossi's supposed fusion device?
Contextual details -- such as the media handling -- pretty much convinced me that Rossi is a con artist shoveling big steaming loads ... but, of course, my contextual conclusions lack scientific merit

So I hunted the web some for anything that might indicate more precisely what Rossi is doing, or what Rossi says he is doing, or what various people say Rossi has told them he is doing, or what various people guess Rossi might be doing

As far as I can tell, we're being told that finely divided Ni in an H2 atmosphere undergoes nuclear reactions Ni + p -> Cu with rate controllable by H2 pressure

Details beyond this are sketchy

Unfortunately, I can't distinguish what Rossi might have told some people from other people's speculations: the clearest statement, that I've found so far, claims Rossi uses Ni enriched significantly in Ni-62 and Ni-64 together with some cheap catalyst to encourage the nuclear reaction

But this use of the common word "catalyst" seems unusual: I expect the primary energy barrier to be electrostatic repulsion between Ni nucleus and proton, and I can't see how ordinary chemical interactions (which affect the electron shell) to reduce this repulsion enough to allow Ni + p to proceed

The nucleon numbers in the possible reactions are nowhere near the magic numbers of nuclear shell theory, so I can't see why Ni + p capture should be favorable. But I haven't found an online table showing data for nuclear reactions of Ni and Cu isotopes: that would be useful to have, for example, when considering the common objection that there seems to be no significant radiation

Of course, there might be other possibilities. So one might want to know how permeable a Ni or Ni-Cu lattice is to proton and how stably a proton might be trapped in the lattice

If anyone knows of relevant resources on this, I'd be happy for the references

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC