Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The BS about nonexistant "Autism epidemics" is pissing me off!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 12:08 AM
Original message
The BS about nonexistant "Autism epidemics" is pissing me off!
I'm sick of that crap, and I'm sick of a certain DUer who shall remain unnamed peddling that crap. A lot of that nonsense is promoted by "cure-bie" groups like Autism Speaks and Defeat Autism Now that have a vested interest in creating hysteria about us on the spectrum. :grr:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. the problem is
they truly do not understand the details of how differing diagnostic criteria can affect numbers. And if you try to explain it to them, you see the eyes start to glaze :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. There is also a gross failure to distinguish between symptoms and a condition
That is, if someone displays some symptoms consistent with a given condition, then that person is considered to have the condition, regardless of mitigating factors.

It's like saying "I have a headache; therefore I have a brain tumor."

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lizerdbits Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. I was discussing this with my mom once
and she said 'I knew other kids when I was younger who had some of these characteristics and they were just considered odd or eccentric by others. Why do they think this is a new thing?'

My guess would be that the original diagnosis was made with really extreme cases and then others were included based on a few characteristics which drew in many more people. Thoughts on that Odin since I'm just guessing? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. it's the same ignorance
That believes Cancer is a modern day disease. Epidemiology is not a DU strong point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Don't forget confirmation bias!
The poster I am referring to said last night that he's convinced because "what he read confirms what he sees with his own eyes". In other words, holy confirmation bias Batman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Cancer didn't exist until people started cutting vitamin D from their diets
True fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. DAMN YOU D!
*shakes fist*
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not true!
People didn't cut vitamin D from their diets... Big Pharma and the evil Food Industry did that!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's the chemtrails
The chemtrails are blocking the UV B light. Fortunately, my 100W UV B laser treatment (it's all natural light!) hits the market next month. Just point directly at your eye and press the "Healing Light" button.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. There is lots of evidence...
that diagnostic criteria have changed and that children who would once have been described as 'language-impaired', 'disturbed', 'psychotic', 'mentally handicapped' or at the higher-functioning end 'just a bit odd' are now diagnosed as on the autistic spectrum.

Add to that the fact that some children who have very severe birth difficulties, which would have killed them 30 years ago, now survive with an increased chance of autism, and I don't think that there is any strong evidence for a mysterious 'epidemic'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC