Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you suppose that any vaccine/autism believers can ever be conviced otherwise?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:25 PM
Original message
Do you suppose that any vaccine/autism believers can ever be conviced otherwise?
I've had the discussion dozens of times, and it always boils down to "I believe it, so you're wrong neener-neener-neener."

In this regard, the belief is just like Creationism.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probably not.
Look at the thread in the science forum about this. I think that should tell you all you need to know. Especially the one guy who was citing a NIH doc who I think is a bit on the paranoid side.
People in there KNOW I've got that background and yet, that seems to just convince them even more that they are right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. And yet I must be the bigger fool
Because I keep going back again and again. I just got through with one of them, and she basically dismissed every reasoned point I made as "spin" and "mumbo jumbo."

I guess the reason that we keep at it is for the sake of the innocent reader who might otherwise come away with the impression that the Woos are in charge and that they're (god forbid) correct! :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm getting awfully tired of it.
You will notice that I have absented myself from that thread..and I make it a point to avoid health now..as important as dubunking the bullshit is, I just can't afford the aggravation health wise..
I knew I needed to leave the science thread when I asked someone how the fuck a vaccine causes a genetic defect..You know when I start cursing its not a good thing...:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yeah, I was right behind you in that thread
Hannah Poling is the sainted martyr of vaccine-induced autism. The woos' invocation of her name as some kind of unassailable paragon of innocent victimhood is, in my view, a sickeningly cynical tactic intended to appeal to emotionalsm, once again at the expense of reason.

Don't let it aggravate you in real life--they're nuts, and they're likely to stay nuts. As William S. Burroughs said:
Do not offer sympathy to the mentally ill. Tell them firmly, "I am not paid to listen to this drivel. You are a terminal fool."


True words, true words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Its hard to listen to people
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 05:35 PM by turtlensue
bashing your coworkers and respected colleages and not take it personally. Its not being called a shill so much that upsets me, but having people I respect and like being dragged through the mud by ignorant idiots. I saw a version of this at NIH (which is why I told someone that being a scientist at NIH doesn't always score points with me) that just made me sick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That particular individual is otherwise quite rational and sane.
But on the vaccine issue, he's neither. Oh well, not everyone can be perfect like us. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Until about two tears ago I had no idea there was a controversy
But I visited Wooville and discovered philb pontificating from on high.

I read both sides of the story and followed links from many different posters.

After considerable time spent reading about this controversy, I concluded that the Mercury Mafia was full-o-shit and the Rational Raiders were on the right track.

So next time you doubt the significance of your participation, remember, there may be another person like me who needs to know that it is not just a one sided issue.

I understand how you get frustrated. I too take breaks from Wooville. But don't give up just because they are ten times crazier than you are sane.

Perhaps we should take shifts like the Wooville Neighborhood Watch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks--that actually means quite a lot!
Most times I'm sufficiently narcissistic that I can expound at length upon any topic at all, with or without good reason, but this particular issue's been wearing me down. It's greatly encouraging to learn that some people are benefiting what can otherwise seem like a fruitless effort!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. No
Facts, evidence and logic rarely are convincing to a true believer no matter what the belief. Our brains are structured against it. One can only hope to educate the ignorant who have no opinion or persuade those who are on the fence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Probably people who've not followed it closely can be convinced..
but strong believers, no.

There are some who have autistic family members, and are desperate for a simple explanation and possible cure - and are manipulated by the charlatans. (As with other ill-understood chronic medical conditions.)

Then there are those who are just deeply suspicious of conventional medicine in all its forms, and this is one part of it.

And then there are those who have been swayed by emotional media presentations.

To be fair: there HAVE been quite a number of mistakes and cover-ups by governments, that have probably led to people being more prepared to assume that everything is a cover-up. In the UK, the government's unwillingness to face the truth about the dangers of 'mad cow disease' in the late 80s probably contributed to a mindset favourable to the rubbish spread by Andrew Wakefield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. NO
the true believers stand firm in their stupidity
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. very few, if any
even when presented with actual studies, they think it's a science conspiracy. And without that evidence, there's nothing. So as long as it's BIG PHARMA!!!1! we got nuthin
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. not many of the hardcore ones, no. but there are a lot of ambivalent bystanders
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 05:14 PM by enki23
the measles virus-> no wait mercury-> ->maybe aluminum? -> umm... shots are bad? people can't be reached, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. NO.
That's a big fat emphatic NO.

The person you were "arguing" with is still on my ignore list, but I know full well who it is. Dense as a rock. Apparently she's latched on like a pitbull to the Poling case as the PROOF, huh?

Yeah, there's no ability to change minds there. None whatsoever. They've bought into it hook line and sinker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. No, they have an intense psychological need to think we will become "normal" if they just...
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 12:44 AM by Odin2005
...found some way to "cure" us Autistics. It's all about selfishness on the part of parents that want the perfect child.

This crap is especially hurtful to us Autistics because they call us "damaged" and "poisoned" and need to be "cured," it's an attack on who we are, it is just as much bigotry as the people that think homosexuality can be cured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. When big pharm quits payoffs to shills
maybe people would not be so suspicious of big pharm co's.
You know,people like this guy- http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/dekalb/stories/2008/10/04/Emory_professor_investigation.html
Emory University officials said Saturday that a prominent psychiatric researcher has been accused several times in recent years with not disclosing earnings from drug companies and not revealing potential conflicts of interest....

Congressional investigators have found that Nemeroff received $2.8 million in consulting fees from companies, some whose drugs he was evaluating, and failed to report a third of that amount to the university, according to a story this weekend in the New York Times. If true, the allegations represent a violation of federal research rules and university ethics guidelines....

Congressional investigators have found that Nemeroff received $2.8 million in consulting fees from companies, some whose drugs he was evaluating, and failed to report a third of that amount to the university, according to a story this weekend in the New York Times. If true, the allegations represent a violation of federal research rules and university ethics guidelines....

Outside Emory, Nemeroff has had to deal with at least one other conflict-of-interest allegation.

In 2006, he left his post as editor-in-chief of the national medical journal Neuropsychophamacology following an outcry over an article he wrote, giving a positive review to a medical implant manufactured by Houston-based Cyberonics. Nemeroff and seven of his co-authors did not disclose in the article that they worked as paid consultants and sat on an advisory board at the company.


Granted,this guy is not dealing with vaccines.But he is an example of a big pharm shill.
Here are some more articles on this fine,upstanding researcher who would never,ever compromise his work by.... Do I really need a sarcasm thingy here?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. And if people would STOP BROAD BRUSHING all these companies
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 09:13 AM by turtlensue
as teh evil, maybe we could actually get things done! FYI--there are tons of highly ethical and quite scientifically talented companies (like the one I work for--hell I found out yesterday my lab may have made a fairly interesting scientific discovery!) which people don't hear about and then people assume they don't exist. There are bad eggs in every field and usually you don't hear about the good ones. Funny how people on this site complain CONSTANTLY about the MSM but when it comes to biopharmaceuticals..thats where they get all their news. And the MSM knows JACKSHIT about this field.
And none of these stories are every as cut and dry as people make them..for every Vioxx case theres about 20-30 real success stories in new drugs but no one gets that.
I also know just because a company screws up one product doesn't mean they don't make other things that are safe and effective. I've worked with the scientists from Merck when I was at NIH and other places and they are quite competent and knowledgable.
I'm sorry I'm not God and can't make every bad person in my industry go away.
:rant:

On edit: Also my company is about to market a new technology which extends the effectiveness of immunological drugs! So instead of a patient having to get an infusion every three months..it will be more like every 6 months! Gasp! Evil money making Pharma wanting to make drugs more efficient?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. I was just on the health forum...
god, do some of the posts get me down there (and I survive on the Israel/Palestine forum, so I'm not one who can't handle controversy!) But the denial of adequate medical care to kids in developing countries is a hot button for me, and when people imply that exporting vaccines to developing countries is an evil plot THAT'S what really gets me. Yes, it's OK for millions of children to die of preventable diseases but not to get vaccines. China has supposedly seen a 'sharp rise in autism' - perhaps because kids there now live long enough to demonstrate autism (a horrendous number didn't before the vaccines)? And get to see doctors and get diagnosed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rexcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. Logic and understanding of science and medicine...
are not a part of their being. Fear and misunderstanding drives them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
20. Sure, if they get smallpox. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC