Sarah Palin predictions

[Nancy Waterman]

Hi all, I haven't been here in a while but I wanted to post my latest predictions about Sarah Palin. I think she may well run in 2012.

http://starlightnews.com/wordpress/?p=121#comment-29338

With the publication of her book, Going Rogue, and her subsequent book tour, Sarah Palin (2/11/64; 4:40 PM; Sandpoint, Idaho) managed to totally dominate the star-struck national media for a full week, drowning out pretty much anything of consequence. With TV interviews on day and night, an endless cascade of news stories about those interviews (including video), and ongoing speculation about 2012, pundits wondered who could possibly compete with her “sparkle”. They gushed shamelessly over enormous campaign-like crowds that swarmed around her like flies to sugar. On the down side, attention was also given to the long list of exaggerations and outright lies dwelling between the covers of the now infamous book, and many from the former McCain campaign were quoted or interviewed with their own, more fact-based version of events.

Astrologically, we find that Palin’s progressed Venus is currently square to natal Mars (23Aquarius27), an aspect that brings a great deal of personal charisma and attractiveness. It will be exact in December 2009 and is presently being strengthened and made very dramatic, prone to a kind of magical aura by the transit of Neptune conjunct natal Mars and square progressed Venus, in October and much of November. This configuration glazes Palin’s raw sex appeal (Mars/Venus) with a larger-than-life illusion of glamour (Neptune). The Mars/Venus combination will be triggered again from December 10 through December 16 by Jupiter conjunct natal Mars, a week during which we can expect to see her former-beauty-queen face plastered everywhere, yet again.

more...

[get the red out]

1. It would create a Republican blood bath primary

Mit Romney and Mike Huckabee aren't going to go down without a fight, and Huckabee is such a misogynist he would never let a mere WOMAN best him. Huckabee is a man beloved by the religious extremists and Romney has $$$$$. It could get interesting. Northern Republicans would like Romney and be scared of the other two, and the Southern Republican stronghold would not elect Romney for numerous reasons. All three have only the most selfish motives and care nothing for the people of this country at all. Karma.

[Myrina]

2. ... not to mention if Ole Crankpuss Lou Dobbs tosses his hat in too ..

... should be fun to watch!! :popcorn:

[get the red out]

3. Yep, I'll need a real popcorn popper

The little microwave bags just wouldn't cut it for this! :evilgrin:

[Fire Walk With Me]

4. No predictions (can't stand looking at her, much less with the third eye)

but if people like that are placed in positions of power, =we will get what we deserve=. Period. We are base cowards for having allowed Bush and friends to squat in the White House for eight full years, doing whatever they wanted...if we elect Palin, we are criminally insane and functionally utterly incompetent, and deserve the appropriate punishment.

Which would, in her case, definitely include the use of nuclear weapons to bring about her "church"s agenda. This is a prediction. It is based upon her moment of bliss in response to the VP debate question regarding the use of nukes. Call up the video and watch her reaction. She calls up an image of some sort and nearly shudders in response. I wish to discuss this further, to get others' insight/visoins, if you are interested in first seeing it for yourselves. It's there, all right.

Woe, woe is us.

Here is hoping that the increasing presence of the higher dimensions preclude anything like her from happening. Because although armageddon is not seeming in the schedule as it exists, it may be brought about by those who are willing to build it (if not countered by those who do not want it). "The price of peace is victory over those who do not want it." -jms, "Babylon 5".

It is, as always, up to us. And we are true cowards. Perhaps this will be what it takes to get people truly up off of their asses and into unity and unity-based action. Here's hoping that indeed, the higher vibrations will completely derail such negative persons, as her. What do we want? We will get it, or it will be created and given to us by those who are willing to do some work. It, and the results, are entirely up to us.

I've spent myself screaming against BushCo for the last five years. I don't know if I have it in me to continue screaming against such as Palin for any who would listen. Yes, a small group of determined sociopaths will be able to damage it for everyone if allowed. Pray that the higher vibrations force them out, that the voices and actions of sanity and true patriotism prevail. Look to the documents of the Founding Fathers and work to increase them.

(Happy to find that "palin" is not in the DU spellchecker!) :)

[Fire Walk With Me]

16. Might anyone have insights regarding her moment of bliss

upon being asked in the VP debates about the use of nuclear weaponry? I'm very interested in what others have to say, regardless of whether it contradicts me.

I feel that she may well be the single worst disaster facing the country, ever. At least in terms of what she would "accomplish" on the path of destruction, even compared to BushCo.

BushCo were (spiritually) prevented from creating a nuclear event within the US (check the energy of late summer 2007). Palin may well succeed in creating many across the world. Even one is too many.

[Kind of Blue]

5. We just have to put up with her for a little while

because the rest of the forecast is good news, indeed. This is really hard to do though x( x( x( x( x( x(

Nancy Waterman, your February 5, 2001 overview of the Bush administration really gave me the chills. Of course, he immediately gave me the chills back then so I'm glad I didn't read it - I would have even been more depressed. I don't know how astrologers can bear such harsh forecasts. But I look forward to reading more of your past predictions. Thanks!

[Sanity Claws]

7. Nancy, could you repost your 2001 prediction about Bush?

I'm talking about the post Kind of Blue referred to. It'd be interesting to look at in hindsight.
Thanks!

[Kind of Blue]

10. Hi, Sanity Claws. I was wrong about the date.

:hi: It's February 15, 2001. I somehow managed to click on the http://starlightnews.com/ and saw a huge list of past predictions in the left frame. It was bang-on but sobering reading, for sure. I just had to know what Nancy foresaw at the beginning of these horrible years.

[Nancy Waterman]

13. Just posted it on a new thread

Nice to be back and see all of you again.

[nadinbrzezinski]

6. Nancy I have missed you

:hi:

[Cleita]

8. Nice to see you here again Nancy and you have been missed.

Your predictions are so accurate. She so reminds me of another beauty queen, Imelda Marcos and an actress, Eva Peron. Neither of them belonged in politics any more than Sarah does, but they had that personal charisma thing going that put them on the political stage. I wonder if there are similarities in the charts of all these ladies?

[murielm99]

17. We have one of those types of women here locally.

She scares me a great deal. And she is a Democrat!

My husband has some good insights into her appeal. Even though she is in her late fifties, her blondness and her surface confidence fool many people. She is uneasy around me because I see through it. She knows how to use what she has.

This local woman does not belong in politics either, or any kind of leadership position at all. I wish I knew how to limit her damage.

How does understanding their charts help? Does it help?

[Grateful for Hope]

9. I think if she runs

it is a guarantee that Obama will be re-elected. She is perfect in terms of dividing the republican party.

I hope this is true.

[get the red out]

11. I agree

She may well captivate the right, but that will show exactly what they are all about and how far gone they are. It will be the perfect juxtaposition of sanity vs insanity, reality vs a cartoon.

[Cleita]

12. I wish I shared your optimism, but I remember when "W" ran the first time and everybody

I knew thought he was a clown. There was no way he'd get elected everyone said. The woman is dangerous and we need to keep a close watch on her.

[Nancy Waterman]

14. I predicted Bush would win the first time

and Gore would lose. The second time wasn't clear at all.

[Fire Walk With Me]

15. Ding!

Roses are all pretty and such, but try to hug a rosebush and you'll be shredded by thorns.

America needs to outgrow its obsession with (exploding) bright, shiny objects. Content...content...remember people, content. May enough people not have to learn that lesson at the expense of the rest.

[get the red out]

18. AMEN!

We have a short attention span in this country, and our thoughts rarely penetrate the surface of whatever the media presents us. This is on of my greatest frustrations in our society.