Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oct. 22, 4004 B.C.: Universe Usshered In

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 05:27 PM
Original message
Oct. 22, 4004 B.C.: Universe Usshered In
Wired observes what is certainly a non-anniversary, but something that's still interesting:

4004 B.C.: It’s the beginning of time, according to 17th century Irish bishop and theologian James Ussher — and not just any old moment on that fateful date, but “on the beginning of the night.”

Ussher’s calculations, published in the Annals of the Old Testament, Deduced From the First Origins of the World, strike most modern sensibilities as absurd. Except for a few Young Earth Creationists, believers and nonbelievers alike agree that if a supernatural entity created the universe, it happened about 13.75 billion years ago.

But Ussher was far from the first person to wildly miscalculate the universe’s age. Indeed, dating the universe was quite the scholarly fad. Among others to try their hand were Johannes Kepler and Isaac Newton, both of whom arrived at estimates younger than Ussher’s.

All labored without a number of modern tools — not only for measuring radioactive decay or rates of the universal expansion, but an intellectual framework for conceiving of time on scales beyond the biblical.


Short but interesting article. I'm posting in the Science forum as much in jest as anything else, given how half the posts on any article involving the year 4005 BC or before get drowned in Ussher-related comments. (That, and if I posted this in GD it'd devolve into yet another tired religious wankfest that ignored the actual article.)

That said, I agree with Gould's assessment. Chronology on a large scale is bloody hard even when you've got lots of data on hand, and Ussher didn't have lots of data on hand. "Honourable effort for its time" fits, even though most of us know better and plenty more should know better by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's just speaks to the sophistication of people
At that time to make complex calculations - even when
They were wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. The inability to conceive of extra-Biblical time scales was a Western-mind problem
As so many have pointed out before, traditional Hindu religious texts spoke of some events happening over a scale of many billions of years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC