Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Tree Genus Discovered in Honduras

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 04:10 PM
Original message
New Tree Genus Discovered in Honduras
Analysis by Tim Wall
Mon Oct 18, 2010 09:16 PM ET

Botanists discover new species of plants relatively frequently, but describing a new genus may be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

A team led by Carmen Ulloa, associate curator at the Missouri Botanical Garden, recently discovered a new tree in northwest Honduras .

In the misty cloud forests of Parque National El Cusuco (Spanish for the Armadillo National Park), the tree was known only to the squirrels, coatimundia, and local Hondurans. The locals called it guayaba, because the fruit resembles the guava, though it is not edible by humans.

It is now known to science as Hondurodendron urceolatum.

Ulloa and her team did not immediately know that the tree was a completely unknown genus.

They first became aware of the tree in 2007. Three years of painstaking genetic and structural analysis proved to them that this 40-foot tall specimen was something completely new to science.

more

http://news.discovery.com/earth/new-tree-genus-discovered-in-honduras.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. "New" to white human scientists.
The forest has known all along that it was there.

The "It Doesn't Exist Until Americans Know About It" philosophy drives me nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. New as a genus, which is a human-science classification.
But that, being scientific, is based upon explicitly-defined criteria, by which the tree is shown to be of a previously-undescribed genus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Major +1. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Major for the genus-describers.
But quite immaterial to the tree, I daresay.
And equally immaterial to the people who have always known about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC