Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Superheavy Element 114 Finally Re-created

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 06:32 AM
Original message
Superheavy Element 114 Finally Re-created
y Alexis Madrigal September 29, 2009 | 12:48 pm | Categories: Physics



By firing calcium isotopes into a plutonium target inside a particle accelerator, scientists at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory have finally confirmed the Russian discovery of the superheavy element 114.

It wasn’t easy. It took more than a week of running the experiment to generate a measly two atoms of the stuff, which they reported in Physical Review Letters last week. It’s basic science at the outer limits of matter.

“We’re learning the limits of nuclei,” said Ken Gregorich, a nuclear physicist at LBL. “How many protons can you pack into a nucleus before it falls apart?”

Uranium, which has 92 protons in its nucleus, is the heaviest element found in substantial quantities in nature. The first man-made “transuranic” elements like plutonium were discovered and synthesized during the 1940s in the run-up to the creation of nuclear weapons. Since then, it’s gotten harder and harder to produce new elements, but scientists have kept at it. One reason is they hypothesized that certain isotopes of very heavy particles might exist in an “island of stability” that would allow them to stick around longer than the fractions of a second most synthetic elements last.

more:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/09/superheavy-elements-are-rad/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. What I want to know
Is what they are going to name it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd definitely go with something really intellectual.
Maybe "poopypantsium", or how about "nimrodatite"?

Or there's always the option of illudium Q-36!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. LOL - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'll go with "Palinite"
1. It's really expensive to produce.
2. It doesn't last long, but still longer than one would expect.
3. It disappears in a showy flash of particles, leaving nothing of consequence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I thought I was too jaded
for the spontaneous spit-take, but you've proven me wrong.

:spray:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And it's really freakish that such a thing can even exist.
I think that often about Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC