Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Journalist + science = idiocy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 07:01 PM
Original message
Journalist + science = idiocy
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/09/21/supernova.reut/index.html

I leave to you to find the obvious silliness in this article.

Hint: There's one thing for DAMN sure a physicist didn't say. lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. You don't expect a journalist to be able to tell the difference...
...between mass and size, do you? I mean, we all know that big things are heavier than small things, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. lol - that's an an ambiguity - not an outright error...
... and you didn't clarify it by using the words "size", "big", and "small" - try "volume" instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Science is anathema to journalists
and vice versa.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. lol! nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Journalists have to become reasonably well-versed...
...in a huge number of topics, frequently on very short notice. The clear majority have a healthy respect for factual accuracy, despite a few flubs now and then. The reporter who wrote this may not have spent his life studying the topic, but considering the circumstances, I'd say he did a decent job.

Just because journalists don't have to deal with much complex math doesn't mean their job is any less tough than that of scientists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. lol! An eloquent defense of idiocy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. At least you thought I was eloquent.
I am going to school for journalism, after all. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. There's a more serious error...
...than the confusion of mass and size. A sentence like this one:

Scientists have believed that dying stars known as "white dwarfs" can't expand to more than 1.4 times the size of our sun without exploding...

...stems from misunderstandings of key points made in this way, from Wikipedia:

White dwarfs cannot independently exceed 1.4 solar masses (the Chandrasekhar limit).

The journalist has misapprehended a key point. Science isn't talking about white dwarfs growing, but about a limit on the size of ordinary star that can become a white dwarf. One might just as well say that fighter pilots can't grow above six feet tall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC