Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Medellin execution allowed...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:14 AM
Original message
Medellin execution allowed...
Treaties be damned again, and this isn't the first time the Supremes have ruled on treaties vs. US law. It is again 5-4, and there's little guessing who was who.

Texas, alone among the states with the death penalty, has held out for executing Mexicans who haven't been aprised of their rights. All other states, AFIK, have held moratoriums on executions of Mexicans who haven't contacted their embassy or consulate.


UPDATE: Medellin execution allowed
Tuesday, August 5th, 2008 11:31 am | Lyle Denniston
FINAL UPDATE 10:20 p.m.

Splitting 5-4, the Supreme Court refused Tuesday night to delay the execution in Texas of Mexican national Jose Ernesto Medellin. The majority’s unsigned opinion, and dissents by each of the other four Justices, can be read here.

The majority said that the chance that Congress or the Texas legislature would act to provide a remedy for the treaty violation in Medellin’s case was “too remote” to justify delaying the execution. The majority’s Per Curiam (”By the Court”) relied in part on the fact that the Justice Department had not opted to take any part in this latest round of the Medellin case, even though it was actively involved when the Court last ruled on it on March 25.

“The Department of Justice,” the majority said, “is well aware of these proceedings and has not chosen to seek our intervention. Its silence is no surprise. The United States has not wavered in its position that was not prejudiced by his lack of consular access .”

While noting again, as it had in March, that it was up to Congress to make the Vienna Convention binding law within the U.S., the majority said that “Congress has not progressed beyond the bare introduction of a bill in the four years since the ruling and the four months since our ruling in Medellin v. Texas. This inaction is consistent with the United States’ decision in 2005 to withdraw the Untied States’ access to jurisdiction of the with regard to matters arising under the Convention.”

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Texas loves a good kill'n. They have more than their share of mass murders
anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC