Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CDC approved multidose injectable flu vaccines -- including the H1N1 (swine) flu -- are toxic waste.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:21 PM
Original message
CDC approved multidose injectable flu vaccines -- including the H1N1 (swine) flu -- are toxic waste.
http://www.epa.gov/waste/hazard/tsd/mercury/regs.htm

If mercury levels in a waste exceed the Toxicity Characteristic Leach Test (TCLP) level of 0.2 mg/L for mercury, then the waste is identified as a hazardous waste based on the toxicity characteristic.

The mercury level of any CDC-approved multivial H1N1 vaccine is 49 mg/L. That's 245 times greater than the EPA's standard for toxic waste. Multidose flu vaccines are toxic waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Also when a vaccine does not include mercury, it includes formaldehyde
people with MS symptoms are very vulnerable to any level, even the lowest levels fo formaldehyde.

Injecting pregnant women with this crappola should be considered a criminal offense.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Most medicines and hospital supplies are as well - time to boycott health care!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Who needs it?
The world is overpopulated, anyway, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. Most medicines and hospital supplies are toxic waste?
Really? Can you back up that claim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are classified as a biohazard...
If they have a spill, a hazmat team must be called. True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. That's bullshit. If there's a spill of flu vaccine, the person giving
the shots wipes it up with a paper towel and disposes of it in the same place he/she throws the alcohol wipes used on your arm. Why do you lie about this? What's in it for you to tell lies?

You've already had that explained to you by someone who gives vaccinations. Yet, you continue to tell the same untruth. Feh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. If antivaxers were confined to the truth
they'd be struck mute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. What about the OP was not factual? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
57. all of it!
BTW, I've worked in a lab that makes vaccines (including sometimes influenza) and what you are saying is complete bullshit. Now the preservative itself, is general disposed of in a safe manner, but the vaccines themselves are not toxic. You know even the phased out mercury thermometers aren't as dangerous as woos like you think! You are so transparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #57
61. Multidose flu vaccines are toxic waste 245 times over using the EPA's standards.
I'm sorry you have so much trouble dealing with a simple and indisputable fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. .
http://extranet.fhcrc.org/EN/sections/ehs/hamm/chap6/section8.html

3.Microbiological Wastes: Laboratory wastes containing or contaminated with concentrated forms of infectious agents. Such waste includes discarded specimen cultures, stocks of etiologic agents, discarded live and attenuated viruses, blood or body fluids known to contain infectious pathogens, wastes from the production of biologicals and serums, disposable culture dishes, and devices used to transfer, inoculate and mix cultures (BSL-1 through BSL-4 etiologic agents as designated by NIH Guidelines/BSC).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. "If they have a spill, a hazmat team must be called."
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 05:17 PM by trotsky
Your link doesn't even come close to supporting your outrageous and ridiculous claim.

Oh, and on edit: your precious quote doesn't even mention vaccines at all. Swing and a miss - AGAIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
67. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. This is why a little learning is a dangerous thing
It allows you to read broad guidelines for labs specializing in disease research and try to apply it to your doctor's office.

The real world doesn't work that way. Perhaps you need to listen to those of us who have worked in the real world.

Despite what Dr. Google tells you, a spill of vaccine from a broken vial is simply wiped up with a paper towel and that towel is tossed into the regular trash. The broken glass is usually dumped into a sharps container so no one gets cut by it.

Hazmat is not called and the area isn't sterilized with bleach or Virex.

It's just wiped up. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. That's not going to happen.
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 01:56 PM by Why Syzygy
Perhaps you need to listen to those of us who have worked in the real world.




The November 1999 report of the Institute of Medicine (IOM), entitled To Err Is Human: Building A Safer Health System, focused a great deal of attention on the issue of medical errors and patient safety. The report indicated that as many as 44,000 to 98,000 people die in hospitals each year as the result of medical errors.

Even using the lower estimate, this would make medical errors the eighth leading cause of death in this country—higher than motor vehicle accidents (43,458), breast cancer (42,297), or AIDS (16,516). About 7,000 people per year are estimated to die from medication errors alone—about 16 percent more deaths than the number attributable to work-related injuries.
http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/errback.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. When your lies are debunked
just go off on some insane tangent!

Sorry, Dr. Google, it's just not going to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. S.O.P.
Gets shot down OVER and OVER and OVER. She'll either ignore you, or just change the subject with another attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #33
48. Insane?
It's logic. You're asking me to put my faith in someone who works in the field which is at least the 8th leading cause of preventable deaths. Not listening to you seems like the wisest course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. Multidose flu vaccines still meet the EPA's definition of toxic waste 245 times over.
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 05:00 PM by mhatrw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Nope just sweep it up and throw the glass in a sharps container.
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 07:14 PM by Fire_Medic_Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like a lot, huh?
Actually, the actual amount in any of the flu vaccines is 25 micrograms in each .5 milliliter individual dose. Your statement about 49 mg/L is irrelevant. The level is 1 part per 10,000. Now, how much is 25 micrograms? Not enough to cause the effects you imagine.

The average human absorbs far more than that from the environment. Mercury is a naturally-occurring mineral and has always been in our food at some level.

I notice you give a link to an EPA site. Here's a link to another government site, dealing with vaccines, rather than hazardous waste. It's worth a read. I'm really surprised you didn't include this link, too:

http://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/safetyavailability/vaccinesafety/ucm096228

Well, maybe not that surprised.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lots of stuff used in medical offices qualifies as "toxic waste", lol.
Including 100% of the safe and effective medications we use. But the correct term is "medical hazardous waste".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Amount of thimerosal in a single dose of H1N1 vaccine = 50 ug...
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 04:02 PM by SidDithers
(Using the Canadian data for unadjuvanted H1N1 vaccine, for adjuvanted vaccine, it's only 5ug)

So, since thimerosal is 50% mercury, there is 25ug of mercury per dose.

Amount of mercury in a can of tuna fish = 60 ug (.5ppm allowable x 120g of tuna/can)

The dose make the poison. I believe that's been mentioned to you once or twice.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So, eating half a can of tuna gives you about the same amount
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 04:24 PM by MineralMan
of mercury as contained in the flu vaccine. I was just about to post a similar thing. This whole mercury thing is a typical bogeyman tactic. OOOOH! Mercury Bad! And yet, we make the kids how many tuna sandwiches a year, each containing the same dose of mercury as a flu shot?

How much is a microgram? Well, it can help to break it down from something we all understand. There are about 27 grams in an ounce. We know what an ounce is, right. So, lets divide our ounce of stuff into twenty-seven equal portions.

Take one of those portions, then divide it into tenths. Then, divide each those tenths into tenths, and so on, until you have reduced that original 1/27th of an ounce into a million equal parts. That's a microgram, folks. You can't see it. You can't weigh it without some really, really specialized equipment.

Why must the anti-vaxxers lie to make their point? Why do they not include all the pertinent information? Why do they not explain that you get far more mercury from your diet on a regular basis? The amount of mercury in a dose of flu vaccine has no effect. Cumulative mercury intake from dietary sources usually has no noticeable effect, although for some, it can, especially if diets are heavy in fish and fish products. The flu shot won't cause mercury poisoning or any mercury-related effects. You'll get those from your diet. Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yup, betcha most kids eat a tuna sandwich once a week...
50 sandwiches, quarter can of tuna in each. That's about the same as 25 vaccine shots.

Silly anti-vaxxers.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They're not silly. They're dangerous.
Spreading false information is just plain wrong and may cause harm to people who listen to them and don't investigate for themselves.

Thanks for helping to expose their untruths to public view. I'm with you all the way on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. True that...
keep fighting the good fight.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. More fun with math...
Allowed mercury in a can of tuna is .5ppm = 500 ppb
EPA's standard for toxic waste is 2 ppb

ZOMG! Canned tuna is 250 times worse than toxic waste!!!

What a fucking joke :puke:

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Aw, jeez...I spilled some kitty tuna on the floor. I guess I'd
better call the hazmat team. Man...that's going to be expensive, you know. I think I'll just wipe it up with a paper towel and keep my mouth shut. What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. LOL! This is odd...
I'm starting to get a perverse little thrill from watching you go wonkers. I never enjoyed watching anyone suffer before. This is a first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. What you need to do
is inject some of that kitty tuna juice. You can't compare oral vs. intravenous quantities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Vaccines aren't injected intravenously.
They are intramuscular injections.

Quite different, but then you surely knew that, and accidentally posted a glaring falsehood, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. So intramuscular injections are "quite diffferent" from intravenous injections is terms of mercury
uptake?

Do you have any evidence to back up this contention? I would be very curious to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. The dose makes the poison: true or false?
Answer my question and I will answer yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. The dose makes the poison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. Your article does not answer the way you think it does.
So will you ever answer? Or do you like making yourself look completely silly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #52
59. My new favorite article is my answer to your incessant, disruptive questioning.
I endorse what the article says, and it answers your question quite well.

There is a grain of truth in your favorite aphorism, but toxicology does not begin and end with it. Wouldn't you agree?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #59
63. 'incessant disruptive questioning'?
Pots and kettles come to mind here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. oh oops.
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 10:29 PM by Why Syzygy
Mr. Ignored is objecting to "intravenous" as opposed to "intramuscular"! :rofl:

Attn. Mr. Ignored: INJECT is the KEY WORD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #49
99. Are you actually trying to argue with someone you have on Ignore?
If so, that's ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Hey! Wait! They allow 2 ppb in drinking water!
So, I'm drinking hazardous waste in my coffee! I'm doomed! Doomed, I tell you. And you know...when you make coffee, some of the water evaporates, concentrating the mercury even more. Oh, crap! I got as much mercury in my last cup of coffee as in a flu shot. I might as well go back to bed and wait for the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. You would have to drink more than 3 gallons of borderline mercury
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 06:47 PM by mhatrw
contaminated water (by the EPA's standards) to receive as much mercury as there is in a single 0.5 ml shot of multidose flu vaccine.

Would you like to drink 3 gallons of mercury contaminated water right now if you could avoid it? Why or why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
55. Takes me about 6 days to drink 3 gallons of water...
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 04:38 PM by SidDithers
so, in a year, I get 60 times as much mercury from water as I do from a single dose flu shot.

Plus, I probably eat half a can of tuna every week. In a year, I get ~50 times as much mercury from tuna as I do from a single dose flu shot.

25 ug is unmeasureable without specialized instruments.

The dose makes the poison.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #55
75. It's great that the water you generally drink is borderline mercury contaminated.
Have you ever considered moving away from the fluorescent bulb factory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. The OP is toxic waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. What percentage of bullshit is allowed in an OP before
it qualifies as toxic waste?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. The OP is 100% factual.
Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. No argument here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. What about fish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. What about vaccinated fish?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
98. That'll be the end of us all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
25. It seems that I hit a nerve with some people here.
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. I did not post a lie. I have never posted a lie.
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 04:56 PM by mhatrw
Nice responses. Calling me a troll and a liar.

Have any of you folks ever read the rules of this site?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Your OP is untrue.
You are making a claim that is not supported by any evidence. You are conflating two different chemicals and then further distorting a guideline to make a ridiculous assertion. And I did not call you a liar, I said you posted a lie. You could have done so unknowingly - maybe somebody really, really stupid told you to post your claim.

But you pretty much admitted to being a troll on this subthread. You posted just to get a reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. I am not conflating two different chemicals.
The EPA does not have a different standard for ethylmercury contamination than it has for methylmercury contamination or elemental mercury contamination. You know this. You must know this. If you somehow do not know this, then use some common sense. If you have no common sense, then try using google.

I'm still waiting for your list of mercury compounds that are perfectly safe for humans to ingest and inject. Where is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. You want to bring up questions that we're waiting for answers?
:rofl:

TRUE OR FALSE: The dose makes the poison.

Give me a one word answer. I DARE YOU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #45
51. The dose makes the poison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. I've given you every chance to answer it yourself.
You refuse and refuse. Clearly you KNOW you are spreading misinformation because you know very well what the answer is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #53
60. LOL. I posted my answer. You just don't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #60
85. That could be because your answer is that you have no answer.
Or that your answer has no basis in reality.

Or...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #85
96. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #96
97. Thanks for the admission of your failure to prove your claims, yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. I am enjoying your cartoon. n/t
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 03:23 PM by truedelphi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #25
54. Something is not right.
You admit to posting this baseless BS simply to get a reaction. When others point that out, those posts are deleted, while the thread remains.

What gives DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. Bullshit anti-vaxx lies are tolerated here for some reason.
I think it has to do with the lack of scientific knowledge on the mods part. Opinion and outright lies are hard to differentiate if you don't have a science background.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. You simply can't deal with a simple, indisputable fact.
Multidose flu vaccines are toxic waste 245 times over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #62
66. The EPA also has a minimum size for something to be considered "toxic waste"...
you know that, right?

The minimum reporting quantity for mercury discharge is 1 pound. That's right. If a company has a mercury spill, as long as it's less than 1 pound, they don't need to report it to the EPA.

http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/bnsdocs/mercsrce/mercreg.html

1 pound = 454 g = 454,000,000 ug = 18,160,000 H1N1 vaccine shots


So, spill 18 million doses of H1N1 vaccine, and then you've got toxic waste.






Now, I fully expect you to carry on with your uninformed blatherings.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Check your math.
Edited on Sat Nov-14-09 02:24 PM by mhatrw
There are 2000 vaccine shots in a liter of vaccine. A liter of water weighs one kilogram. So there no way that one-half liter of vaccine (1000 vaccinations) weighs less than a pound).

But keep spreading your disinformation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. But there's only 25 ug of mercury in a shot...
2000 vaccine shots would only be 50mg of mercury.

It's you who's spreading disinformation. And who's being laughed at for it.

Sid



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #70
73. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
56. HAHAHAHAHA!
What a dumbass post. So are CFC's. I guess fish are as well. You realize that the mercury content of fish is about 100X greater than any vaccine right? Medical school doctor my ass. You are BY FAR the most ludicrous anti-vaxxer on this board! :rofl:
I see the usual idiots lapping up your stupidity.
BAN FISH RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #56
64. Why spread disinformation?
Edited on Sat Nov-14-09 11:19 AM by mhatrw
According to the http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/Product-SpecificInformation/Seafood/FoodbornePathogensContaminants/Methylmercury/ucm115644.htm">EPA's website, the median amount of mercury in swordfish (which has the highest median amount listed) is 0.86 PPM.

In contrast, the percentage of mercury in vaccines is about 50 PPM, and well over 50 times as great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #64
65. Concentration is a meaningless measurement, without volume...
For a controlled size dose, in this case .5 ml, we know that the total dose of mercury will be 25 ug.

When we eat swordfish, the average "dose" is probably, what, 250g?
.86 ppm = .86 mg / kg
for 250 g piece of swordfish, we get .215 mg of mercury = 215 ug

So, for every half-pound piece of swordfish you eat is equivalent to 8 vaccine shots.

And yet millions of people eat swordfish every day without consequence.

Your arguments in this thread are ridiculous, you have no understanding about why concentration, without volume, is a meaningless measurment.

Sheesh.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. It's not meaningless. Pregnant women & little kids are not supposed to
Edited on Sat Nov-14-09 02:19 PM by mhatrw
be eating swordfish:

http://www.epa.gov/fishadvisories/advice

Therefore, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are advising women who may become pregnant, pregnant women, nursing mothers, and young children to avoid some types of fish and eat fish and shellfish that are lower in mercury.

By following these three recommendations for selecting and eating fish or shellfish, women and young children will receive the benefits of eating fish and shellfish and be confident that they have reduced their exposure to the harmful effects of mercury.

1. Do not eat Shark, Swordfish, King Mackerel, or Tilefish because they contain high levels of mercury.


Therefore, your argument at the dosage of mercury in a single vaccine is fine because eating swordfish is fine is disingenuous at best and, I would argue, dangerous and harmful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. Because, when a pregnant woman eats swordfish...
she doesn't stop at 30g, which is the portion size where she'd get the amount of mercury equivalent to a vaccination. What's a portion size on a swordfish steak? Typically, it's 8oz, or 225g.

So, yes. Comparing concentrations is completely fucking misleading.

You're clueless. I'm done correcting your misinformation in this thread. Other posters can easily see why you're wrong (again).

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #71
74. Wow. I can see that logic really isn't your strong suit.
Good luck, though, with whatever it is you are good at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #74
90. Are you talking to yourself?
If you're not, you should be.

Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #64
72. You do it in nearly every post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #72
76. Saying something over and over doesn't make it true.
Sorry, but I don't apologize for stating indisputable facts.

Anyone who wants a reasonable conversation gets one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #76
77. Then why do you keep doing it?
Example Mercury and Thimerosal are chemically the exact same thing and can be used interchangebly. Just address that one issue reasonably. Put your money where your mouth is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #77
78. There are no safe forms of mercury and you know it.
Yes, there is some recent evidence that ethylmercury clears the body quicker than methylmercury. I hope and pray that this evidence actually means that injected ethylmercury is safer than ingested methylmercury. But where are the full toxicology studies for ethylmercury? Are you actually prepared to discuss this issue reasonably?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. Thimerosal in the allowable doses is a safe mercury compound.
We give tens of millions of vaccines a year with very small amounts of thimerosal in them. Yet we don't have a single conclusive bit of evidence that thimerosal causes harm. So yes thimerosal in very small doses is a safe mercury compound. Feel free to volunteer for some toxicology test on ethylmercury I'm more than happy with the anecdotal evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. How reasonable. Put the burden of proof on thimerosal's harm rather than thimerosal's safety.
And then use circular reasoning: "Since we have been assuming thimerosal is perfectly safe for all these years, then it must be perfectly safe. You know, since so many other mercury compounds are so harmless to ingest and inject."



"Yep. Just as I thought. No problems with injecting mercury in little kids and pregnant women here!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. We haven't been assuming we've been observing. Nice try though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. Where are the full toxicolgical studies on thimesosal?
Where are the epidemiology studies on thimesosal in vaccines?

This is how you have been "observing":



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. Nice self portrait. Is this an example of some of your rational discussion skills?
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 11:29 PM by Fire_Medic_Dave
I'd call the people in charge of toxicology studies and ask them your question. The decades of obvious evidence is enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #84
86. Where are the full toxicolgical studies on thimesosal? Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #86
87. Try a google search.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. LOL. Link them up for us since you are so sure they exist. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. First you link to where I said they existed or admit you are making things up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #89
91. Zip. Nada. Zilch.
Just what I expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #91
92. So you can't prove your claim, yet again.
What is your reason for posting here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #92
94. Multidose flu vaccines are toxic waste 245 times over using the EPA's standards.
Read the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #94
95. Nice red herring.
But that wasn't the claim I was referring, as you well know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #91
93. That's exactly what you always present zip, nada and zilch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-15-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #72
82. Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC