Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bad cereal choices for kids

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:48 PM
Original message
Bad cereal choices for kids
Is it a candy bar or cereal?

The least healthy cereals are the ones most marketed to children, according to this report from the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University.

The scores, which range from 0 to 100, are based on a nutrient profiling system that's used in the United Kingdom to determine whether products can be advertised to children on television. Australia also uses the scores to determine whether health claims can be made. A score of 62 or greater is a "healthy" product.

Here are the advertised cereals with the poorest nutrition rankings:

Reese's Puffs--34
Corn Pops--36
Lucky Charms--36
Cinnamon Toast Crunch--37
Cap'n Crunch--37
Trix--38
Froot Loops--38
Fruity and Coca Pebbles--38
Cocoa Puffs--39
Cookie Crisp--40

more:

http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/features_julieshealthclub/2009/11/bad-cereal-choices-for-kids.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I want this!
"a nutrient profiling system that's used in the United Kingdom to determine whether products can be advertised to children on television"

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Yes...because even more restrictions on...
commercial speech is always a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes, because sweeping generalizations make perfect sense, always!
:rofl:

Hint: context/nuance/etc. :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You said that you would be in favor of...
"a nutrient profiling system that's used in the United Kingdom to determine whether products can be advertised to children on television." Or rather, you said that you "wanted" it.

I therefore understood that to mean, that you supported the idea that the government should use a nutrient profiling system to determine whether products can be advertised to children on television. Or, in other words, you supported the idea that the government should be able to limit commercial speech; something that (in my opinion) already happens way too often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I do agree with that *particular type* of limiting commercial speech.
Your broad-brush reply to my comment was in need of a fair bit of tweaking, wouldn't you say?

I agree with the limits on advertising that are already in place, and I think we need more (e.g. pharmaceutical advertising).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Hmm. I would be interested in hearing some
examples of current restrictions on commercial speech that you think are excessive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any parent with 1/2 a brain could figure this out themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We are talking about people, now- so many aren't going to be able to figure it out!
See Palin, Sarah and followers....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. No kidding. Luckily, I've got a weird kid -- she likes homemade wholewheat toast
and yogurt or apple slices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. My kids eat oatmeal or Mini Wheats.
Once in awhile I'll get a sugar cereal for a lazy Saturday or the first day of school. But I try to really load them up with a good breakfast, esp. during the school year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh man, I knew it. Cap'n Crunch does not score well. Curses.
Just thinking about those sweet golden crunchies brings back memories and makes me want to run out for some.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Memory: Roof of mouth in bloody ribbons...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Yeah, a hard lesson to learn.
The Cap'n must soak in milk for 5-10 minutes or there's hell to pay.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. With the exception of Cinnamon Toast Crunch
All those are delicious!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. You know, just because your kids ask for it
doesn't mean you have to give it to them. Is there anybody out there who honestl believed Lucky Charms were healthy? I eat Captain Crunch myself, but not for breakfast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yep...
My daughter pitched a small fit over this yesterday at the store, but there's no way I'm buying her anything for breakfast where the second or third ingredient is sugar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobburgster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Could ne worse....
I guess I'm half bad (Cinnamon Toast Crunch) half good(Mini-Wheats)


:thumbsdown: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Just reading the NAMES of those cereals makes my teeth hurt. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC