Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Flap Over Public Health Plans: 40 Years Too Late

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:44 PM
Original message
The Flap Over Public Health Plans: 40 Years Too Late

Note to critics of the public plan option for health insurance: This debate is over. You lost. In 2007, more than 45 percent of all medical costs in the U.S. were paid by government, vastly more than the one-third funded by private insurance.

The role of government insurance has been growing rapidly for more than four decades, since the creation of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. From 1970-1990, during a period when the White House was occupied by Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, and George H. W. Bush (a period of GOP rule broken only by the brief Democratic interregnum of Jimmy Carter) government health care spending rose ten-fold. For all the talk of public insurance as Socialism, you'd think Eugene V. Debs must have been hiding somewhere in the Rose Garden during those years.

In truth, millions of Americans already have access to public coverage. There is Medicare for those over 65, Medicaid for the poor (including many frail elderly), SCHIP for kids, coverage for the active military, and for many veterans. In 2008, government paid more than 90 percent of the cost of the Medicare Part D drug benefit, the crowning health care achievement of George W. Bush, a man few would label with the "S" word.

Together, the share of medical spending paid by government has grown from one-third in 1970 to nearly half today, according to the statistics from the Census Bureau and the Labor Department. If your definition of "public plan" includes insurance available through highly-regulated private carriers to federal, state, and local employees, the numbers are even bigger. And, of course, don't forget the quarter-trillion dollar government tax subsidy for employer-sponsored health insurance.

But even using the most narrow definition--those getting direct government coverage-- more than 80 million Americans already have such insurance. That's half as many as have employer-sponsored insurance, but it's still a lot of policies.

Of course, among those 65 and older, far more have Medicare than have private coverage (many have both). Nearly a quarter of all children under 18 are covered by the government. In 2007, private insurance paid for $775 billion worth of health care. That sounds like a lot. But the government paid more than a $1 trillion.

Public plans have been a pillar of health insurance in the U.S. since the 1960s. We can have a perfectly good argument about whether these plans work as well as they should, whether there are markets where private insurance is more appropriate than public coverage, or how we should structure a public plan. But talking about government coverage as if it is the insurance equivalent of a four-leaf clover is just bizarre.

Indeed, when it comes to setting insurance standards, Medicare has been calling the shots for years. For instance, its payments are the benchmark against which private insurers fix the prices they pay doctors and hospitals.

It is especially odd to hear the American Medical Association grumble about public insurance. Back in the 60s, the AMA opposed creation of Medicare, a program the organization decried as, yes, socialized medicine. I suspect those docs never imagined that government would pay about one-quarter of the cost of physician office visits and clinical services as it does today.

Continued>>>>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howard-gleckman/the-flap-over-public-heal_b_218229.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC