Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chiropractic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 04:04 AM
Original message
Chiropractic
Chiropractic (1924)
H.L. Mencken


This preposterous quackery flourishes lushIy in the back reaches of the Republic, and begins to conquer the less civilized folk of the big cities. As the old-time family doctor dies out in the country towns, with no competent successor willing to take over his dismal business, he is followed by some hearty blacksmith or ice-wagon driver, turned into a chiropractor in six months, often by correspondence. In Los Angeles the Damned, there are probably more chiropractors than actual physicians, and they are far more generally esteemed. Proceeding from the Ambassador Hotel to the heart of the town, along Wilshire boulevard, one passes scores of their gaudy signs; there are even chiropractic "hospitals." The Mormons who pour in from the prairies and deserts, most of them ailing, patronize these "hospitals" copiously, and give to the chiropractic pathology the same high respect that they accord to the theology of the town sorcerers. That pathology is grounded upon the doctrine that all human ills are caused by pressure of misplaced vertebrae upon the nerves which come out of the spinal cord -- in other words, that every disease is the result of a pinch. This, plainly enough, is buncombe. The chiropractic therapeutics rest upon the doctrine that the way to get rid of such pinches is to climb upon a table and submit to a heroic pummeling by a retired piano-mover. This, obviously, is buncombe doubly damned.

Both doctrines were launched upon the world by an old quack named Andrew T. Still, the father of osteopathy. For years the osteopaths merchanted them, and made money at the trade. But as they grew opulent they grew ambitious, i.e., they began to study anatomy and physiology. The result was a gradual abandonment of Papa Still's ideas. The high-toned osteopath of today is a sort of eclectic. He tries anything that promises to work, from tonsillectomy to the x-rays. With four years' training behind him, he probably knows more anatomy than the average graduate of the Johns Hopkins Medical School, or at all events, more osteology. Thus enlightened, he seldom has much to say about pinched nerves in the back. But as he abandoned the Still revelation it was seized by the chiropractors, led by another quack, one Palmer. This Palmer grabbed the pinched nerve nonsense and began teaching it to ambitious farm-hands and out-at-elbow Baptist preachers in a few easy lessons. Today the backwoods swarm with chiropractors, and in most States they have been able to exert enough pressure on the rural politicians to get themselves licensed. Any lout with strong hands and arms is perfectly equipped to become a chiropractor. No education beyond the elements is necessary. The takings are often high, and so the profession has attracted thousands of recruits -- retired baseball players, work-weary plumbers, truck-drivers, longshoremen, bogus dentists, dubious preachers, cashiered school superintendents. Now and then a quack of some other school -- say homeopathy -- plunges into it. Hundreds of promising students come from the intellectual ranks of hospital orderlies.

Such quackeries suck in the botched, and help them on to bliss eternal. When these botched fall into the hands of competent medical men they are very likely to be patched up and turned loose upon the world, to beget their kind. But massaged along the backbone to cure their lues , they quickly pass into the last stages, and so their pathogenic heritage perishes with them. What is too often forgotten is that nature obviously intends the botched to die, and that every interference with that benign process is full of dangers. That the labors of quacks tend to propagate epidemics and so menace the lives of all of us, as is alleged by their medical opponents -- this I doubt. The fact is that most infectious diseases of any seriousness throw out such alarming symptoms and so quickly that no sane chiropractor is likely to monkey with them. Seeing his patient breaking out in pustules, or choking, or falling into a stupor, he takes to the woods at once, and leaves the business to the nearest medical man. His trade is mainly with ambulant patients; they must come to his studio for treatment. Most of them have lingering diseases; they tour all the neighborhood doctors before they reach him. His treatment, being nonsensical, is in accord with the divine plan. It is seldom, perhaps, that he actually kills a patient, but at all events he keeps any a worthy soul from getting well.

The osteopaths, I fear, are finding this new competition serious and unpleasant. As I have said, it was their Hippocrates, the late Dr. Still, who invented all of the thrusts, lunges, yanks, hooks and bounces that the lowly chiropractors now employ with such vast effect, and for years the osteopaths had a monopoly of them. But when they began to grow scientific and ambitious their course of training was lengthened until it took in all sorts of tricks and dodges borrowed from the regular doctors, or resurrection men, including the plucking of tonsils, adenoids and appendices, the use of the stomach-pump, and even some of the legerdemain of psychiatry. They now harry their students furiously, and turn them out ready for anything from growing hair on a bald head to frying a patient with the x-rays. All this new striving, of course, quickly brought its inevitable penalties. The osteopathic graduate, having sweated so long, was no longer willing to take a case of delirium tremens for $2, and in consequence he lost patients. Worse, very few aspirants could make the long grade. The essence of osteopathy itself could be grasped by any lively farmhand or night watchman in a few weeks, but the borrowed magic baffled him. Confronted by the phenomenon of gastrulation, or by the curious behavior of heart muscle, or by any of the current theories of immunity, he commonly took refuge, like his brother of the orthodox faculty, in a gulp of laboratory alcohol, or fled the premises altogether. Thus he was lost to osteopathic science, and the chiropractors took him in; nay, they welcomed him. He was their meat. Borrowing that primitive part of osteopathy which was comprehensible to the meanest understanding, they threw the rest overboard, at the same time denouncing it as a sorcery invented by the Medical Trust. Thus they gathered in the garage mechanics, ash-men and decayed welterweights, and the land began to fill with their graduates. Now there is a chiropractor at every crossroads.

I repeat that it eases and soothes me to see them so prosperous, for they counteract the evil work of the so-called science of public hygiene, which now seeks to make imbeciles immortal. If a man, being ill of a pus appendix, resorts to a shaved and fumigated longshoreman to have it disposed of, and submits willingly to a treatment involving balancing him on McBurney's spot and playing on his vertebra as on a concertina, then I am willing, for one, to believe that he is badly wanted in Heaven. And if that same man, having achieved lawfully a lovely babe, hires a blacksmith to cure its diphtheria by pulling its neck, then I do not resist the divine will that there shall be one less radio fan later on. In such matters, I am convinced, the laws of nature are far better guides than the fiats and machinations of medical busybodies. If the latter gentlemen had their way, death, save at the hands of hangmen, policemen and other such legalized assassins, would be abolished altogether, and the present differential in favor of the enlightened would disappear. I can't convince myself that would work any good to the world. On the contrary, it seems to me that the current coddling of the half-witted should be stopped before it goes too far if, indeed, it has not gone too far already. To that end nothing operates more cheaply and effectively than the prosperity of quacks. Every time a bottle of cancer oil goes through the mails Homo americanus is improved to that extent. And every time a chiropractor spits on his hands and proceeds to treat a gastric ulcer by stretching the backbone the same high end is achieved.

But chiropractic, of course, is not perfect. It has superb potentialities, but only too often they are not converted into concrete cadavers. The hygienists rescue many of its foreordained customers, and, turning them over to agents of the Medical Trust, maintained at the public expense, get them cured. Moreover, chiropractic itself is not certainly fatal: even an Iowan with diabetes may survive its embraces. Yet worse, I have a suspicion that it sometimes actually cures. For all I know (or any orthodox pathologist seems to know) it may be true that certain malaises are caused by the pressure of vagrant vertebra upon the spinal nerves. And it may be true that a hearty ex-boilermaker, by a vigorous yanking and kneading, may be able to relieve that pressure. What is needed is a scientific inquiry into the matter, under rigid test conditions, by a committee of men learned in the architecture and plumbing of the body, and of a high and incorruptible sagacity. Let a thousand patients be selected, let a gang of selected chiropractors examine their backbones and determine what is the matter with them, and then let these diagnoses be checked up by the exact methods of scientific medicine. Then let the same chiropractors essay to cure the patients whose maladies have been determined. My guess is that the chiropractors' errors in diagnosis will run to at least 95% and that their failures in treatment will push 99%. But I am willing to be convinced.

Where is there is such a committee to be found? I undertake to nominate it at ten minutes' notice. The land swarms with men competent in anatomy and pathology, and yet not engaged as doctors. There are thousands of hospitals, with endless clinical material. I offer to supply the committee with cigars and music during the test. I offer, further, to supply both the committee and the chiropractors with sound wet goods. I offer, finally, to give a bawdy banquet to the whole Medical Trust at the conclusion of the proceedings.

_______________________

Henry Louis Mencken (1880-1956) was a controversial American journalist, essayist and literary critic. During the 1920s, he became famous for his vitriolic attacks on what he considered to be the hypocrisy, stupidity, and bigotry of much of American life. For obvious reasons, his critics considered him highly skilled at satire but intolerant and often crude. This essay was published in the Baltimore Evening Sun in December 1924. Although the medical knowledge of his day was still quite primitive, Mencken knew enough to realize that chiropractic theory was preposterous.

http://www.chirobase.org/12Hx/mencken.html


H.L. Mencken - the original quack buster :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. There are some here who believe in this quackery
with all the fanaticisms of religious fundamentalism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. No kidding.
Homeopathy too, which is even harder to fathom considering the fact that homeopaths don't hide the fact that all they're selling is water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. The conparison with fundies is a good one.
I prefer scientifically proven cures over some BS quackery about improper flows of some non-existant mystical energy field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. My chiropractor usually helps my sciatica very rapidly
Edited on Thu Mar-30-06 11:27 PM by philb
I have chronic sciatica due to compressed disk and nerve bulge in lower back
But I usually can do a full gym work out the same day as my treatment.

and a friend at work who likewise had a major neck injury is much better after chiropractic work
Her neck spinal column had an improper bend that caused major problems chroically until it was adjusted
to get it lined up properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. I have a friend like that
To her, anything a physician says is 99% likely to be bullsh*t, because doctors are nothing but pillpushers who are beholden to Big Pharma.

However, whatever her chiropractor says is like something directly from the mouth of god himself, to be believed without question. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wain Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wonderful satire, masterfully written
Thanks for posting. Another day of expanded horizons on DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. You're welcome.
And a belated welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wain Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Thanks for welcoming me
I do appreciate being welcomed and the friendliness that is conveyed by DUers.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Mencken is the best.
I read that long ago, and have never been tempted by Chiropractic since, although I don't argue with people who think it helps them.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yeah, the old curmudgeon is one of my favorites.
It's quite liberating when you don't worry about offending the quackopathy believers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Back pain that disappears almost immediately is a strong endorsement.
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 09:36 AM by dmordue
Especially when I've seen MDs and physical therapists make the same condition 10x worse and caused permanant damage in family members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's not a very strong endorsement at all
Suppose someone has headaches and goes to a chiropractor who pops and twists the patient's neck until the pain seems to go away. Voila! Of course, the tumor persists, and in weeks the patient is dead because he went to a bone-cracker instead of an actual doctor.

Unless you can verify that the actual condition has itself improved, then all you've done is treat a symptom. In matters of back injury, this can be a real problem if the patient misjudges his reduced pain to indicate a cure--he can hurt himself a lot worse just because he thinks he's in better shape than he really is.

I have a very good friend who was diagnosed in December--by a team of actual doctors--to be in the early stages of Multiple Sclerosis. His symptoms manifested as back-pain and a weakness/numbness in his legs which were later discovered to have resulted from a form of myelitis--often a precursor to MS.

They can't give him a clear prognosis--it may be decades or months before he begins to suffer the more debilitating effects of his illness.

He's an absolute health nut. He's tremendously fit and seldom eats meat or junk food. He maintains belief in the value of a holistic lifestyle, and he is very receptive to the claims of "alternative" practitioners.

When he mentioned his back pain to several of his friends who likewise endorse "alternative" treatments, they all (all of them) heartily urged him to visit a chiropractor, for all of the most popular reasons: "it's inexpensive;" "it doesn't require drugs;" "it can't hurt you;" etc.

Well, if he'd gone to a chiropractor, he'd have been instantly paralyzed from at least the waist down. See, his spinal cord was so inflamed and vulnerable that the acrobatic cracklings of a chiropractor would been too much for the cord to withstand. But hey, at least that's better than using those Big Pharma drugs, right?

Au contraire. He was put on a battery of steroids and other medications which have greatly improved the health of his spinal cord, greatly reduced his back pain, and restored some feeling to his legs.

The ultimate prognosis is not rosy, but at least he didn't begin his battle against MS by losing the use of his body from the waist down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. a chiropractor I know
Sends patients back their MDs when they miss a cancer diagnosis. It has happened several times. He has to make sure he doesn't tell them they have cancer, since he is not supposed to diagnose it. So he sends them to their doctors and does things like show them a place on the xray and tell them to ask the doctor what it is.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuddhaGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I've had wonderful success with chiropractic
I had constant neck and upper back pain that would cause peristent headaches. I had a few deep tissue massages that helped some, but I still got the headaches.

About 5 or 6 visits to the chiropractor and voila! Headaches were gone. Neck and upper back pain gone. I haven't had a headache in almost a year! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. I worked for a man who was permanently damaged by a quack.
He injured his neck playing basketball and followed the advice of friends who told him a chiropractor could fix him right up.

He fixed him all right.

Glenn can't turn his head either to the left or the right now, thanks to the ministrations of said quack.

He won a huge lawsuit but he says he would give it all back if he could have full range of motion again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. As many are damaged by doctors/pharms each year as from cancer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Oh, I'm sorry philb, you must have missed this:
http://www.geocities.com/healthbase/null_hypothesis_laidler.html

3. In deriving his numbers on "bad outcomes", Mr. Null adds all types of adverse outcomes together without considering (either through ignorance or intent) that many of these are not due to medical error or other failure but are merely the natural consequences of the disease or injury. Infection, for instance, is usually not due to medical error but is a natural risk of surgery, injury and disease. The question NOT asked is this: "How many of these adverse outcomes would have occurred WITHOUT medical intervention." Let me give some examples.

Example 1: A patient develops a skin infection following surgery for an inflamed appendix. This infection is treated with antibiotics and resolves over 7 - 10 days. This would be reported as a post-operative infection on the hospital statistics. However, without surgical intervention, the patient would likely have died in 7 - 14 days of a ruptured appendix and overwhelming peritonitis - another sort of infection.

Example 2: A patient comes to the hospital with chest pain - the diagnosis is myocardial infarction ("heart attack") and he is admitted to the ICU. Two hours later, he dies of heart failure. This is reported as an in-hospital death. He almost certainly would have died at home without medical intervention, but his death is "credited" to the hospital because that is where he died.

Example 3: A patient goes to her doctor's office complaining of a severe sore throat and gets a prescription for an antibiotic. Shortly after taking the first capsule, she develops a rash. In the emergency room, she is diagnosed with a mild allergic reaction to the antibiotic and sent home with a different antibiotic. This is reported as an adverse drug reaction(ADR).


Those numbers are bogus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FM Arouet666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I am sorry Philb, I have a question.
Normally I would refrain from asking another respondent about their back ground. However, your seemingly lack of knowledge and experience with science and medicine has piqued my curiosity. What is your back ground?
You post screens of data and links, an uncritical cornucopia of pseudoscience and alternative medicine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. LOL!
Sure you have. Oh brother, but you're propaganda doesn't sell here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC