Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wyeth, Drugmakers Lose as Top US Court Allows Suits - after phenergen/gangrene suit case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:39 PM
Original message
Wyeth, Drugmakers Lose as Top US Court Allows Suits - after phenergen/gangrene suit case
Its not known what impact this will have on claims that Pfizer Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline Plc should have done more to warn that their anti-depressants might cause suicidal tendencies.

Wyeth, Drugmakers Lose as Top U.S. Court Allows Suits

Bloomberg News By Greg Stohr

March 4 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that patients can sue drugmakers for failing to provide adequate safety warnings, upholding a $7 million award to a musician who lost her arm after being injected with Wyeth’s Phenergan nausea treatment.

The justices, voting 6-3, said that pharmaceutical companies aren’t shielded from suit by the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of a treatment and its packaging information.

...The ruling is a victory for Diana Levine, 63, a children’s musician who says Wyeth should have warned against the injection method that caused gangrene in her right arm.

...U.S. drug-approval law bars state rules that create a “direct and positive conflict” with federal requirements.

The administration of former President George W. Bush backed the industry, arguing that jury awards can interfere with the FDA’s work by forcing drugmakers to exaggerate some dangers.

....






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reading the link, I'd go after whomever gave the med.
Doing IV meds, you need to be careful since if they don't go into the vein they can cause serious problems like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yeah, I'm not sure how the Pharm Co is liable for an RN giving a med incorrectly
Edited on Wed Mar-04-09 07:14 PM by Heddi
When we pull Phenergan from the Pixys, there is a HUGE note that Phenergan is a vesicant, that it must be diluted in minimum 10ml Normal Saline and must not be given faster than 25mcg/min or something. The vial that contains a single dose also has a "vesicant warning" on it as well.

The first thing we were taught in RN school re: IV meds was (and I don't kid) that PHENERGAN IS A VESICANT!!! Do not give it straight, give it as close to the body as possible (larger veins), stop the infusion IMMEDIATELY if the pt complains of burning during IV administration, and notify pharmacy and the MD ***IMMEDIATELY*** if there are any signs of infiltration after IV administration.

I'm not sure why the drug company is liable, unless (and this isn't made clear in the article) the vesicant warning and need to dilute was not made clear on the bottle, or instructions weren't given to the Pharmacy/hospital/RN that it is a vesicant that must be diluted.....

And on edit---there are TONS of IV meds that can cause the same problem because they are vesicants. I think either Calcium Gluconate or Calcium Chloride---can't remember which one---but there was a pt at a hospital I worked at who had to have their hand amputated because the Ca IV was given in a hand vein (should be given in large vein), the IV infiltrated and wasn't noticed until the IV infusion was done and the IV pump beeped, the RN noticed but even at that time (approx 30 min to an hour later) it was too late to save the hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I started to IV push an infiltrating vesicant med once
Person ended up with a gouge out of their elbow. Giving a med wrong is an error of the person giving the med. The person who got hurt needs to go after that person. I don't understand why the drug company would be liable unless there wasn't a warning given, a cya thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Just based on the article, it sounds like the award from the pharmaceutical company was ...
Edited on Thu Mar-05-09 08:24 AM by Jim__
... based on inadequate safety warnings on the package. It sounds like their appeal was claiming that since the FDA approved the drug and packaging, the pharmaceutical company couldn't be held responsible. The Supreme Court ruled they can be, and my guess is that a jury was convinced that the safety warnings were inadequate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wait a minute--I'm confused
What happened to the government-wide conspiracy to protect Big Pharma?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Obama took office in January. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingobject Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. So Wyeth fracked up on piss poor safety "warnings"
Then frack them. A violinist had to lose her arm before Wyeth had to take
responsibility.

How many regular people had to get fracked before it came to this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Why don't you go find out and then come back and tell us?
Now, do your research well. We want to see statistical analyses, bar charts, and a list of "regular" people that got "fracked" - whatever that means.

Be thorough and devote all your time to it, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingobject Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. here's all you need to know

FRACK






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Why do you put "warnings" in quotes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC