|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 11:02 AM Original message |
an awful lot of people are getting the protection from cancer offered by gardasil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
1. I think these people should be shot. Cervical cancer does not develop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Gee that would be news to my neice who had HPV and now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. your post is the most perfect example of the ignorance that is running rampant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. So give your little girl another vaccine with mercury in it to protect against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. You must have forgotten the :sarcasm: smiley n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 04:56 AM Response to Reply #16 |
28. Most childhood vaccines *do not* contain mercury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 05:11 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. It is not the mercury but a component that causes the problem and your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:26 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. What is the name of this component? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #32 |
74. Thimerosal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Thimerosal IS mercury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #32 |
75. Thimerosal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:31 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Rebutted by whom? In any case, you cannot develop autism for the first time at the age of 10 or 11.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. riiiight. Just because it makes toddlers sick doesn't mean its bad for other human beings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #42 |
67. HOLD on, it's not only in the US that people need vaccinations! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 07:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. HOLD ON, the US handles vaccinations differently than YOUR country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 02:37 AM Response to Reply #72 |
80. I cannot stifle or speak for you; but neither can you for me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 02:55 AM Response to Reply #72 |
82. P.S. I was responding in my 'mercury' remark to a statement about the dangers of mercury! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Guess my ex-girlfriend in college, who had cervical cancer, was lying about her age then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 11:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. Everyone gets cancer earlier now. And poisons of all types are part of the equation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:29 AM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Mercury is no longer used in vaccinations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:45 AM Response to Reply #25 |
36. Gardasil doesn't include mercury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Gee, but without investigation, we won't know what is making these girls sick after Gardasil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #43 |
70. What precisely has that got to do with the statement that it doesn't contain mercury? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
57. The fact remains, most cc develops in women over 40, as the poster said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Many people get it at younger ages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
101. nevertheless, most people get it over 40. i believe something like 75%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 11:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Advocating killing public health researchers is way over the top. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 05:13 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Would you give it to your own 11 year old child then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #30 |
64. Big leap from not giving a vaccine to killing vaccine researchers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 04:01 AM Response to Reply #64 |
83. Do you know what a figure of speech is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. How big of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #30 |
68. Yes - if I had a child that age, I would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 10:11 PM Response to Reply #68 |
77. You should trust less and research more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 02:44 AM Response to Reply #77 |
81. I don't 'trust' and I do 'research'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
psychmommy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
5. i am concerned with fast tracking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. this vaccine was not fast tracked and was studied in both europe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. yes, it was given expedited review. you should check the facts before venturing your "opinion" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Fast tracking is merely a way of expediting review of studies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
40. priority review = reviewing data in less time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. No, it means the review goes to front of the line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. "Priority review" per fda: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Well, then...since the clinical trials of Gardasil were over 10 years...then it wasn't fast tracked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #45 |
55. as for the clinical trials, your statement that "clinical trials were over 10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Given that Phase IV is ongoing and that testing on males is also ongoing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 06:02 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. it was fda APPROVED june 2006, before completion of phase 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 06:29 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. And you think it hasn't been reviewed since? Apparently you don't know shit about post-approval. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. The drug was put on the market in 2006, even before completion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. And still, I haven't been shown evidence that the vaccine is unsafe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Haven' t been shown, or just unable to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. I think we've about exhausted the possibilities of this discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. You left this bit out also.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. And without surrogate endpoints....the time to bring the drug to market would have been 30 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 04:00 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Surrogate endpoints aren't "standard". I'm quite willing to admit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Given there was an unmet medical need to prevent hpv infection....fast tracking was called for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. That's an opinion, & irrelevant to the question under discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 05:23 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. ROFLMAO! Is your contention that waiting in line makes a product safer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 05:58 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. no, my contention is gardasil was fast-tracked & its review process was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Okay. Let's try this analogy. Let's say you have a copy Moby Dick and a copy of Tom Sawyer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Per FDA: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. And so the system worked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #46 |
103. the REQUEST doesn't alter the length of review. The designation of priority DOES, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
psychmommy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. your article discusses it. i read your link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 03:09 AM Response to Reply #10 |
27. then you don't know how to comprhend what you read. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
psychmommy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 08:33 PM Response to Reply #27 |
73. insults instead of info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
47. Merck filed Gardasil with the FDA on Dec. 1 (2005) and requested fast-track review |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Meaning that review of the data from the clinical trials got priority review. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #48 |
104. no, fast-tracking is not identical to priority review. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
9. How many lulled into complacency by this unproven claim? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Same old talking points over and over and over and over and over and over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. The Parrot Anti-Defamation League would like to protest your comparison... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I apologize to parrots every where. mea culpa. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. Deleted message |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 09:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I can't believe you said that. I just don't believe it. Nobody would be that crass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. It was a "what fresh hell is this?" moment, when I read that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 10:05 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I hope everyone alerts on that post. I did. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
agent99 (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 10:34 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. whew! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-23-08 10:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Come back some time when you can't stay so long. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 06:44 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. I think you messed something up, though: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
26. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:40 AM Response to Reply #26 |
35. Deleted message |
semillama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 09:50 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. What's your favorite frozen pizza? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I heard Skinner has a vending machine full of frozen pizzas! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Deleted message |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-24-08 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
78. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 02:28 AM Response to Original message |
79. Merck raking in $1.4 billion a year on a vaccine that does more harm than good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 07:07 AM Response to Reply #79 |
84. How many is enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 02:39 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. is what she says true, or false? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. How many time does it need to be said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. so if thAt's the cAse, why do you jump into every threAd with spite & |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 05:59 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. How many times does it need to be said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 11:52 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. I don't think Merck is any more evil than the average huge corporation driven by the profit motive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 06:47 AM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Now I see! You are a Moral Crusader! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #92 |
95. If you love Big Pharma, anyone trying to help people make informed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. And if you hate big pharma with your passion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #95 |
100. The VERY NEXT TIME that anyone calls supporters of access to Gardasil (or any other medication)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 07:00 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Why is arguing with you 'fervently wishing to censor you'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 07:16 AM Response to Reply #93 |
94. She is "morally compelled" to shout down all opposition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. I am speaking out in an effort to get both sides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. So how long do you have to keep repeating the same message? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #99 |
102. I believe there are people on this board who refuse to logically consider my data. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. Do you think you can change my mind just by being obnoxious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhatrw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-26-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. You have not been trying to censor me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-25-08 06:32 PM Response to Reply #79 |
90. You're responsible for proving your claim "a vaccine that does more harm than good". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-03-08 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
106. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC