Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vaccine stops 75% of deaths from Cervical Cancer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:31 PM
Original message
Vaccine stops 75% of deaths from Cervical Cancer
Cancer jab 'stops 75% of deaths'

Both vaccines block the human papillomavirus
Vaccinating all 12-year-old girls against the virus which causes most cervical cancers could cut deaths from the disease by 75%, a study suggests.
GlaxoSmithKline's Cervarix jab targets two strains of the human papillomavirus. The firm's findings were presented at the International Papillomavirus Conference, along with a study on rival jab Gardasil from Sanofi Pasteur. Gardasil was found to be effective on more strains of HPV than first thought. For the Cervarix research, a computer model was used to predict the outcome of vaccinating all 12-year-old girls in the UK - a total of 376,385. Applied to the whole of the UK on the basis of the latest cervical cancer figures, it would mean 262 deaths each year, compared with the current level of around 1,000.

The number of annual cases of the disease would also drop from 2,841 to 682. The researchers admitted 100% coverage assumed in the study was unrealistic, but said even if 80% were vaccinated, the number of deaths would drop by 61%. Cervarix works by targeting HPV 16 and HPV 18, the two most common forms of the disease. It has also been found to be effective at targeting some of the other most common strains.

Competition

GSK is in fierce competition with Sanofi Pasteur, who are about to see their vaccine, Gardasil, granted a European licence. Cervarix is still being developed and will not reach European approval stage for around another year. The research into Gardasil, presented at the conference in Prague, the Czech Republic and funded by Sanofi Pasteur, found it provided protection against 85% of HPV strains responsible for cervical cancer - up from 75% shown by previous studies. Dr Nick Kitchin, medical director at Sanofi Pasteur, said the results were "very promising".

Dr Anne Szarewski, clinical consultant at Cancer Research UK, said: "HPV vaccination offers great promise in terms of reducing the number of cases of cervical cancer and preventing deaths from it. "Beyond the cases and the deaths, hundreds of thousands of women each year in the UK suffer anxiety when they have an abnormal smear result. "The idea of finally being able to prevent cases of cervical cancer with a vaccine is extremely exciting."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5311598.stm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. "262 deaths each year" This would mean horrible, painful deaths. I have
seen women die of cervical cancer and it is horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is resistance to this already in the US (12 yr old girls)--will pro-
mote sex they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Better they die than have sex
unless it is with some old, republican male with a pe**s pump...:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And they say this as if the risk of HPV infection which may lead
to cervical cancer will discourage young women from having sex. These people live in a dream world and they think that abstinence before marriage will solve every problem related to a woman's sexuality. They never consider the possibility of a woman becoming infected with HPV after marriage. I guess they assume that none of their husbands will have had premarital sex either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You know it
All those little wannabe skanks, they're just waiting until the threat of cervical cancer has been taken away and then off they go. It must be another sign of the apocalypse, rapture index must be up to fasten your seatbelts over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. This will promote extra sexual conduct....
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 06:34 PM by mtnester
like a DPT vaccine promotes people to run amok puncturing themselves with rusty nails.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. What's the anti-vax crowd's opinion on this?
The anti-vaccination movement is large and diverse. Some are opposed only to the use of thimerosal. Others don't think we should use ANY vaccines. Seems to me liberals belonging to at least the latter group will have a tough time reconciling their belief with this proven life-saving vaccine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC