It was perhaps to be expected from such a large conference with so many diverse voices, but it struck queer activist Joseph DeFilippis, nonetheless. At the plenary session on Saturday, November 12 at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Creating Change conference, John D'Emilio, former director of the task force's Policy Institute and current professor at the University of Illinois, Chicago, harshly criticized gay marriage proponents for what he characterized as misplaced priorities and a hijacking of the movement. Following D'Emilio's remarks, said DeFilippis, half the room burst into uproarious applause. The other half of the crowd sat confused, almost as if stunned to be in the company of its own community.
"My feeling about this year's Creating Change was, 'Wow. There really are two different conferences happening,'" said DeFilippis, the executive director of New York's Queers for Economic Justice, and one of several panelists at last Thursday's pre-conference institute dealing with class issues. "There were all these major marriage activists, and all these people who were really sick of it. Some people were sick of it because they felt it diverted energy and funds from other issues. And some people, like myself, are actually scared about what gay marriage is going to do."
DeFilippis and others at last week's conference said they favored domestic partnerships and other ways to legally recognize nontraditional family structures such as the army of ex-lovers that often serves as a caregiving network for queers and polyamorous and extended families of all sexualities. Pushing for things like universal healthcare, they said, would be preferable to pretending that marriage would take care of LGBT people who do not have romantic partners or jobs with benefits. And upholding the notion that only romantically involved people are committed enough to deserve recognition, they said, could have devastating effects on the community.
If conferences like Creating Change are a microcosm of the national LGBT movement, then it is evident that more outreach must be done to bring pro-marriage and anti-marriage forces together in the struggle. This is particularly true in places like California, where the right wing has combined the issues of marriage and domestic partnerships in an effort to discriminate against all relationships – gay and straight – that deviate from the one man-one woman model of economic and legal responsibility.
http://www.ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&article=360Wow! Someone finally got up and said what I've been thinking: That the marriage issue (although important) has hijacked energy from LGBT issues that are more universal to the entire community.