Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 08:31 AM
Original message
So......
any thoughts? I wonder if it's not so bad, that they figured they should issue the stay instead of the SCOTUS, thereby giving them more control over the issue itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. It sucks, but the SCOTUS standing issue case cited in the Court's order is very powerful.
The Supreme Court has over the years limited the ability of people to sue by narrowing grounds for standing in federal court. That case may come back to bite them in the ass, or at least give CA9 perfectly reasonable grounds to toss everything out of court.

It's just so disgusting that our fundamental right to marriage is being treated like a ping pong ball, depending on what day it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah...and if you want to talk about the harm...talk about those who are denied
rights because they can't get married right now. It's gonna be a long process, so fasten your seat belts for a bumpy ride!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You are right, of course, which is why the CA9 panel provided no analysis on why it was granting ...
the stay. The Court would have looked foolish (well, more foolish than it looks having granted it anyway) trying to justify that part of its order since there were no reasonable grounds upon which to grant the stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Overly-cautious is all, one hopes...
I need a "fingers crossed" emoticon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, I have a thought.
Commenting on Joe.My.God. last night, I ran across a guy planning to be married this week -- whose boyfriend has cancer.

To those who get to go home every night to their husbands and wives and never have to think about their marriages -- and see us all as just being impatient and immature, and demanding "instant gratification" -- this may be "only" a four-month delay (or "only" a one-year delay, or "only" a three-year delay)...

But for some of us, it means never.

As Phyllis Lyon said in 2004: "Del is 83 years old and I am 79. After being together for more than 50 years, it is a terrible blow to have the rights and protections of marriage taken away from us. At our age, we do not have the luxury of time."

Del Martin died two and a half months after she and Phyllis were finally, legally, married in 2008.

People die every day. A lot of them don't make it to 84, like Del.

Being scolded for being "impatient" makes me want to slap the shit out of some people.

That's my thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed...missing out on marriage you miss out on a large number of rights...
...the damage is not, as the fundies wail, in lifting the stay, but in NOT lifting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dickthegrouch Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. So can we sue for actual damages if PropH8 is eventually eliminated?
I'm out a huge amount of cash opposing the proposition in the first place. Every day I'm denied the right to marry, I'm denied monetary benefits from the government. I'd like to sue those churches and pro-H8ers for actual damages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC