Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Analysts see veto of California gay marriage bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 05:25 PM
Original message
Analysts see veto of California gay marriage bill
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Aiming to shore up support among his Republican base, a politically weakened Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger seems almost certain to veto a bill that would allow gay marriage in California, political analysts said on Wednesday.

The bill, passed late on Tuesday in California's Democrat-led Assembly, marked the first time a state legislature in the United States has endorsed gay marriage. The state Senate backed the bill last week.

A spokeswoman for Schwarzenegger said the governor supports Proposition 22, a voter-approved measure defining marriage as between a man and woman. He also believes the courts are the "correct venue" for deciding on the state's ban on same-sex marriages, she said.

Gay marriage is under review in California courts following San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom's decision in 2004 to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples -- a move that set off a national debate.

http://go.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=9589674&src=rss/ElectionCoverage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wait! The COURTS are the correct venue?
WTF? Isn't that judicial activism? Isn't the legislature where these things are supposed to be decided (according to the RW talking points).

My head hurts from the inconsistency of the RW talking points.:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Fix Is In
If they want the courts to decide, they know that the ruling is going to be favorable to them already. It's in the bag.

I can pretty much predict things based upon their reactions. If it looks bad(Schiavo)....blame the courts. If it looks good(Gore Vs Shrub), then embrace them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. For right wingnuts the "correct" venue ...
... is whichever venue is more likely NOT to approve the measure or, in cases where legislatures and courts might actually approve the measure, then make it the venue most likely to produce the best sound bite: "Damn activist judges!" or "Damn lib'ruls in the legislature!"

(Taken from the Book of Rove, Chapter 12, Verse 34, King Dubya Version)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC